Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Fulfilling Campaign Promises or Following Public Opinion

Does the Size of the Majority Matter

Bibliographic Data

ID6237928
AuthorsMaxime Coulombe (0000-0001-5449-4577, Université de Montréal, corresponding author), André Blais (0000-0003-4292-110X, Université de Montréal), Maria-Alexis Alfaro (Université de Montréal), Sofia Carbonaro (Université de Montréal), Tristan Trinque (Université de Montréal)
Year2021
Volume54
Issue2
Pages463-470
Publication date2021-06-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCanadian Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0008-4239 • E-ISSN: 1744-9324
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s000842392100007x
OpenAlexW3137412715
LanguageEN
References cited15

We perform a survey experiment on the issue of immigration. People are presented with a situation where public opinion is at odds with the election promise. In our control group, no information is given about public opinion. In the treatment groups, respondents are told that 55 per cent or 80 per cent of the people are against the project. When respondents are informed about the election promise but are not told about public opinion, 64 per cent say that the party should fulfill its promise. That percentage drops to 51 per cent when people are informed that a slight majority (55 per cent) are opposed to the project and to 42 per cent when they are told that a strong majority (80 per cent) are opposed. Citizens thus believe that politicians should pay attention not only to the majority view but also to the size of that majority

Immigration · Logistic regression · Odds · Opinion poll · Political science · Politics · Public opinion · Public relations · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Game Theory and Voting Systems · Law · Media Influence and Politics · Medicine

  • The Rationalizing Voter

    Open Access•Milton Lodge, Charles S Taber•Rationalizing Voter•2013

  • Negativity in Democratic Politics

    Open Access•Stuart Soroka, Stuart N Soroka•Negativity in Democratic Politics•2014

  • The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice

    Open Access•Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman•Science•1981

  • Representation Imperatives in the Public Mind

    Open Access•David Doherty, Amanda Clare Bryan et al.•Social Science Quarterly•2019

  • When Do the Ends Justify the Means? Evaluating Procedural Fairness

    Open Access•David Doherty, Jennifer Wolak•Political Behavior•2012

  • When is Changing Policy Positions Costly for Politicians? Experimental Evidence

    Open Access•David Doherty, Conor M Dowling et al.•Political Behavior•2016

  • How Citizens Want Their Legislator to Vote

    Open Access•Ruth Dassonneville, André Blais et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2021

  • Voters’ preferences for party representation

    Open Access•Annika Werner•International Political Science…•2019

  • Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs

    Open Access•Charles S Taber, Milton Lodge•American Journal of Political…•2006

  • Legislator Dissent as a Valence Signal

    Open Access•Rosie Campbell, Patrick Cowley et al.•British Journal of Political…•2019

  • What voters want from their parties

    Open Access•Annika Werner•Electoral Studies•2019

  • Rethinking Representation

    Open Access•Joanna Mansbridge, Jane Mansbridge•American Political Science Review•2003

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae