South American Market Integration
The Argentina-Brazil Rivalry Myth and Motivations for the Southern Common Market
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6239026 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Trygve Alexander Giaever (corresponding author), Julian Schofield (Concordia University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 221-241 |
| Publication date | 2016-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Canadian Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0008-4239 • E-ISSN: 1744-9324 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0008423916000184 |
| OpenAlex | W2342508285 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 18 |
This paper revisits and rebuts the mainstream view that Brazil and Argentina were led to form the Southern Common Market to end more than a century of rivalry and competition. We find the elements characterizing an interstate rivalry diminishing in the nineteenth century through the promotion of peaceful settlements and strategic alliances while those that could prompt security concerns disappeared years before the Southern Common Market was formed. Except for diplomatic disputes over the distribution of shared water resources, a disagreement settled in 1979, the decades preceding the Treaty of Asuncion were typified by security alliances, co-operation on economic complementarity and the promotion of bilateral institutions. We find little evidence for the implied security motivations being proposed in the literature. Rather, the establishment of the Southern Common Market was driven primarily by Argentina's and Brazil's desire to improve economic performance and advance political leverage through the promotion of a common stance in global affairs. This view challenges a common component in integration theory that, as applied to the European Union and elsewhere, asserts the privileged role of security concerns as prime driver for integration. This matters because there is a misapprehension that affects both the theory about integration as well as the formulation of policy prescriptions for South America
Economic integration · Economics · Economy · European union · International trade · Leverage (statistics · Market share · Political economy · Political science · Regional Integration · Rivalry · Single market · Treaty · Finance · International Development and Aid · International Relations in Latin America · Law · Political Conflict and Governance
Parity and War
War and Peace in International Rivalry
The MID 3 data set, 1993–2001
Explaining Latin American economic integration
The MID3 Data Set, 1993—2001
Militarized Interstate Disputes, 1816–1992
Conjuntura Política Nacional O Poder Executivo
Argentina y Brasil en la Política Internacional
Contiguity and Military Escalation in Major Power Rivalries, 1816-1980
Militarized Interstate Disputes, 1816-1976
Measuring Rivalry Termination, 1816-1992
Principal Rivalries
Does Democracy Promote Interstate Cooperation? Lessons from the Mercosur Region
The Hidden Diplomatic History of Argentine-Brazilian Integration
Mercosur, Democracy, and Labor
The Political Economy of Mercosur
The Abolition of the Brazilian Slave Trade. Britain, Brazil and the Slave Trade Question, 1807-1869
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |