Women in Political Science
A History of the Canadian Political Science Association’s Women’s Caucus
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6239293 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Joanna Everitt (0000-0001-5551-4357, University of New Brunswick, corresponding author), Samantha Papuha (University of Alberta) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Pages | 1-22 |
| Publication date | 2025-11-18 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Canadian Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0008-4239 • E-ISSN: 1744-9324 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0008423925100917 |
| OpenAlex | W7105904232 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 14 |
Since its establishment in 1979, the Women’s Caucus of the Canadian Political Science Association (CPSA) has served an important networking, mentoring and advocacy role for women political scientists. While small and informal in its early days, over time the Caucus has become increasingly more formalized and structured in the support it provides to women within the discipline. Drawing on CPSA documents, scholarship on women in the discipline and interviews with several caucus participants, this article identifies the factors leading to the establishment of the CPSA’s Women’s Caucus and traces its development and history over the past five decades. It identifies four distinct periods within the Caucus’s history (1970–1979, 1980–1992, 1993–2005 and 2006 to the present) and argues that as women’s role in the academy has changed, the Caucus has taken on a wider range of priorities and tasks, reflecting the changing composition of the discipline
Caucus · Political history · Politics · Scholarship · Gender Politics and Representation · Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences · Political Science Research and Education
Racism, Sexism, and the University
Women and political studies
The Reality versus the Ideal
WPS
Feminist Institution Building
Il reste encore des travaux à faire
The Formative Decades of the CPSA
Academic Absences, Disciplinary Siloes and Methodological Prejudices within the Political Science Discipline in Canada
Mill's Treatment of Women, Workers and Private Property
Can We Change How Political Science Thinks? “Gender Mainstreaming” in a Resistant Discipline
Far from Ideal
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |