La distinction rousseauiste entre volonté de tous et volonté générale
Une Reconstruction Mathématique Et Ses Implications Pour La Théorie Démocratique
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6239531 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Radu Dobrescu (0000-0001-5780-5094, Université de Montréal, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2009 |
| Volume | 42 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 467-490 |
| Publication date | 2009-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Canadian Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0008-4239 • E-ISSN: 1744-9324 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0008423909090386 |
| OpenAlex | W2142459857 |
| Language | FR |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 17 |
Se situant à mi-chemin entre l'exégèse rousseauiste et la théorie démocratique, cet article vise à éclairer l'analogie mathématique mobilisée par Rousseau pour illustrer la distinction entre volonté de tous et volonté générale et à réévaluer, à la lumière de cette analogie, les débats contemporains autour de la démocratie (libérale, épistémique, délibérative). Il s'agit de régler trois problèmes qui subsistent après la restitution par Philonenko de cet argument mathématique jugé irrécupérable et de montrer que la distinction rousseauiste ainsi reconstruite peut impulser significativement les tentatives actuelles de dépasser la volonté de tous libérale pour retrouver une volonté générale épistémique ou/et délibérative.Abstract. Halfway between Rousseauian exegesis and democratic theory, this article aims at clarifying the mathematical analogy that Rousseau used to illustrate the distinction between will of all and general will, and at reassessing in the light of this analogy the contemporary debates on democracy (liberal, epistemic, deliberative). Three problems that remain after Philonenko's restitution of this mathematical argument considered unrecoverable are solved herein. It is argued that the Rousseauian distinction thus reconstructed can give significant new impetus to current attempts to go beyond the liberal will of all in order to reach an epistemic or/and deliberative general will
Analogy · Argument (complex analysis · Democracy · Epistemology · Humanities · Political science · Politics · Law · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Political Theory and Influence · Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
Why Deliberative Democracy?
Habermas and the public sphere
Reflective Democracy
Du Contrat Social, by J. J. Rousseau, Edmond Dreyfus-Brissac
Rousseau's Social Contract
Epistemic Democracy
Proving a distribution-free generalization of the Condorcet Jury Theorem
What Is the General Will
Deliberative Democracy and Social Choice
Deliberative Rationalality and Models of Democratic Legitimacy
Between Decision and Deliberation
Democratic Theory and the Public Interest
Rousseau's General Will
Understanding the General Will
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,22 |
| Citation span | 2017 - 2021 (5) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |