Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Hobbes's Modern Prometheus

A Political Philosophy for an Uncertain Future

Bibliographic Data

ID6239909
AuthorsLoralea Michaelis (0000-0002-9111-1798, Mount Allison University, corresponding author)
Year2007
Volume40
Issue1
Pages101-127
Publication date2007-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCanadian Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0008-4239 • E-ISSN: 1744-9324
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0008423907070023
OpenAlexW1978745839
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited17

This paper takes the Prometheus story in chapter 12 of Leviathan as the point of entry for an examination of the importance that Hobbes assigns to the problem of an uncertain future in his political philosophy. Hobbes's thinking on human nature represents a dramatic departure from the ancients not only because his mechanistic psychology reverses the ancient conception of the relation between reason and passion but also because his understanding of the temporal situation of human beings privileges the future to an unprecedented degree. It is against the backdrop of a universe in which the problem of an uncertain future has reached intolerable proportions that Hobbes develops his portrait of human nature; it is against the backdrop of this universe that he develops his account of Leviathan as the only earthly power capable of stabilizing the horizon of expectation.Résumé.Cet article utilise l'histoire de Prométhée au chapitre 12 du Léviathan comme introduction à l'examen de l'importance qu'accorde Hobbes au problème de l'incertitude de l'avenir dans sa philosophie politique. La pensée de Hobbes sur la nature humaine constitue une dérogation spectaculaire par rapport aux Anciens non seulement parce que sa psychologie mécaniste s'oppose diamétralement à l'ancienne conception de la relation entre raison et passion, mais également parce que sa compréhension de la situation temporelle des êtres humains privilégie l'avenir et ce, à un degré sans précédent. C'est sur la toile de fond d'un univers dans lequel le problème de l'incertitude de l'avenir a atteint des proportions intolérables que Hobbes construit son portrait de la nature humaine comme un tourbillon de passions incontrôlées; c'est sur la toile de fond de cet univers qu'il élabore son récit du Léviathan, seule force terrestre capable de stabiliser les attentes de l'avenir

Epistemology · Ethnology · Humanities · LEVIATHAN (cipher · Passion · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Relation (database · Sociology · Law · Mathematics · Philosophy · Political Theology and Sovereignty · Psychology · Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought · Social Psychology

  • In the eyes of all mankind

    Open Access•Catherine Frost, Rebekah K Pullen•Journal of International…•2021

  • Integrating anxiety into international relations theory

    Open Access•Bahar Rumelili•International Theory•2020

  • Normalized Exceptions and Totalized Potentials

    Open Access•Anna-Verena Nosthoff•Sotsiologicheskoe Obozrenie /…•2015

  • Education “in the age of uncertainty”

    Open Access•Marianna Papastephanou•The Review of Education Pedagogy…•2025

  • The paradox of possibility

    Open Access•Jennifer Corby•Philosophy & Social Criticism•2026

  • Contesting the Future

    Open Access•Loralea Michaelis•The Review of Politics•2023

  • The Erotic Political Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes

    Open Access•Joanne Boucher•Canadian Journal of Political…•2016

  • Precariousness, the Secured Present and the Sustainability of the Future

    Open Access•David Carvounas, Craig Ireland•Time & Society•2008

  • Hobbesian Moral and Political Theory

    Gregory S Kavka•Hobbesian Moral and Political…•2021

  • Futures Past

    Keith Tribe, Reinhart Koselleck•Futures Past•2004

  • The Practice of Conceptual History

    Reinhart Koselleck•The Practice of Conceptual History•2002

  • The use and abuse of the past

    William R Lund•Hobbes Studies•1992

  • Discourses on Livy

    Niccolò Machiavelli, Alissa Ardito et al.•Discourses on Livy•1996

  • The Politics of Progress

    Margaret C Jacob, Hiram Caton•The American Historical Review•1991

  • Hobbes's Science of Politics

    Antony Flew, M M Goldsmith et al.•The Philosophical Quarterly•1967

  • C.B. Macpherson's“Hobbes”

    Open Access•D J C Carmichael, Don Carmichael•Canadian Journal of Political…•1983

  • II. Hobbes, Puritans, and Promethean Politics

    Open Access•George Shulman•Political Theory•1988

  • Hobbes, Mechanism, and Egoism

    Bernard Gert•The Philosophical Quarterly•1965

  • Political Philosophy and Time

    J G A Pocock, John G Gunnell•History and Theory•1969

  • Hobbes and Psychological Egoism

    Bernard Gert•Journal of the History of Ideas•1967

  • The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism

    Caroline Robbins, C B Macpherson•The American Historical Review•1963

Unique citing works8
Citations per year0,44
Citation span2008 - 2026 (19)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 8

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae