Populism and the Politics of Rights
The Dual Attack on Representative Democracy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6243246 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Rainer Knopff (University of Calgary, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1998 |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 683-705 |
| Publication date | 1998-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Canadian Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0008-4239 • E-ISSN: 1744-9324 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0008423900009604 |
| OpenAlex | W2063014397 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 13 |
| References cited | 18 |
In Canada as elsewhere, representative democracy is under attack by both populists and rights advocates. The populist challenge comes mainly from Preston Manning's wing of the Reform party. The rights-based challenge is grounded on the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. These two challenges are different in obvious ways, but from the point of view of representative government—and ultimately of liberal democratic constitutionalism—what they have in common outweighs their differences. What they have in common is the appeal to a mystical being or icon beyond ordinary politics. In effect, the People or Rights become what God was to pre-liberal theocratic politics: a transpolitical trump on ordinary political division, a way of placing opponents “beyond the pale,” a demand for unattainable purity in public life and policy. While bills of rights and populism appear to flow, respectively, from the liberalism and the democracy of liberal democracy, they are, in fact, vehicles for precisely the kind of politics liberal democracy was designed to overcome. Representative government, not populism or entrenched rights, was at the heart of the “new science of politics” designed to make liberal democracy possible. Representative institutions, properly arranged in a system of checks and balances, were a way of blending liberalism with democracy, giving each its due, but indirectly, so that neither would be taken to self-destructive extremes. Populism and the judicialized politics of rights threaten to dissolve this salutary blend, at the cost of liberal democratic constitutionalism
Classical liberalism · Constitutionalism · Democracy · Law and economics · Liberal democracy · Liberalism · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Populism · Representative democracy · Sociology · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Political Systems and Governance · Public Administration
Parliamentary Sovereignty
Entre mobilisations et institutions
A Typology of Populisms and Changing Forms of Society
Litigating Parentage
The People and The Nation
Parliamentary Bills of Rights
When Might Institutions Change? Elite Support for Direct Democracy in Three Nations
Terms of Entitlement
Demand without Supply
Charter Creep
Between Populism and Juristocracy
Heurs et malheurs de la légalité dans les sociétés contemporaines. une sociologie politique de la « judiciarisation
Le discours de la «nouvelle sensibilité conservatrice» au Québec
The mild voice of reason
Canada’s Origins
The Federalist
Rights talk
Trust
The Moral Distinctiveness of Representative Democracy
Is Quebec Nationalism Just? Perspectives from Anglophone Canada
Human Rights and Social Technology
Political Thought of Lord Durham
Human Rights and Social Technology
Rethinking the Constitution
Is Quebec Nationalism Just? Perspectives from Anglophone Canada
Reconciling Parliament and Rights
The Moral Foundations of the American Republic
The politics of the millennium
| Unique citing works | 13 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,54 |
| Citation span | 2002 - 2021 (20) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 13 |