Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Populism and the Politics of Rights

The Dual Attack on Representative Democracy

Bibliographic Data

ID6243246
AuthorsRainer Knopff (University of Calgary, corresponding author)
Year1998
Volume31
Issue4
Pages683-705
Publication date1998-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCanadian Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0008-4239 • E-ISSN: 1744-9324
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0008423900009604
OpenAlexW2063014397
LanguageEN
Citations received13
References cited18

In Canada as elsewhere, representative democracy is under attack by both populists and rights advocates. The populist challenge comes mainly from Preston Manning's wing of the Reform party. The rights-based challenge is grounded on the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. These two challenges are different in obvious ways, but from the point of view of representative government—and ultimately of liberal democratic constitutionalism—what they have in common outweighs their differences. What they have in common is the appeal to a mystical being or icon beyond ordinary politics. In effect, the People or Rights become what God was to pre-liberal theocratic politics: a transpolitical trump on ordinary political division, a way of placing opponents “beyond the pale,” a demand for unattainable purity in public life and policy. While bills of rights and populism appear to flow, respectively, from the liberalism and the democracy of liberal democracy, they are, in fact, vehicles for precisely the kind of politics liberal democracy was designed to overcome. Representative government, not populism or entrenched rights, was at the heart of the “new science of politics” designed to make liberal democracy possible. Representative institutions, properly arranged in a system of checks and balances, were a way of blending liberalism with democracy, giving each its due, but indirectly, so that neither would be taken to self-destructive extremes. Populism and the judicialized politics of rights threaten to dissolve this salutary blend, at the cost of liberal democratic constitutionalism

Classical liberalism · Constitutionalism · Democracy · Law and economics · Liberal democracy · Liberalism · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Populism · Representative democracy · Sociology · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Political Systems and Governance · Public Administration

  • Parliamentary Sovereignty

    Jeffrey Goldsworthy•Parliamentary Sovereignty•2010

  • Entre mobilisations et institutions

    Open Access•Pierre-Yves Baudot, Anne Revillard•Gouvernement et action publique•2015

  • A Typology of Populisms and Changing Forms of Society

    Danica Fink‐hafner•Europe Asia Studies•2016

  • Litigating Parentage

    Open Access•Dave Snow•Canadian Journal of Law and…•2017

  • The People and The Nation

    Open Access•Chris Erl•Social Science Quarterly•2021

  • Parliamentary Bills of Rights

    Open Access•Janet L Hiebert•Modern Law Review•2006

  • When Might Institutions Change? Elite Support for Direct Democracy in Three Nations

    Open Access•Shaun Bowler, Todd Donovan et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2002

  • Terms of Entitlement

    Open Access•Emmett Macfarlane•Canadian Journal of Political…•2008

  • Demand without Supply

    Open Access•Mike Medeiros•Canadian Journal of Political…•2021

  • Charter Creep

    Open Access•Michael Lusztig•Canadian Journal of Political…•2010

  • Between Populism and Juristocracy

    Open Access•Geoffrey Sigalet•Canadian Journal of Political…•2021

  • Heurs et malheurs de la légalité dans les sociétés contemporaines. une sociologie politique de la « judiciarisation

    Jacques Commaille, Laurence Dumoulin•L Année sociologique•2009

  • Le discours de la «nouvelle sensibilité conservatrice» au Québec

    Chedly Belkhodja•Canadian ethnic studies•2008

  • The mild voice of reason

    Joseph M Bessette•The mild voice of reason•1994

  • Canada’s Origins

    Janet Ajzenstat, Peter J Smith•Canada's Origins•1995

  • The Federalist

    Alexander Hamilton, Benjamin Fletcher Wright et al.•Federalist•1961

  • Rights talk

    Mary Ann Glendon•Rights talk•1991

  • Trust

    Francis Fukuyama•Trust•1996

  • The Moral Distinctiveness of Representative Democracy

    George Kateb•Ethics•1981

  • Is Quebec Nationalism Just? Perspectives from Anglophone Canada

    Joseph H Carens•Is Quebec Nationalism Just?•1995

  • Human Rights and Social Technology

    Ruiner Knopff, Thomas Flanagan•Human Rights and Social Technology•1989

  • Political Thought of Lord Durham

    Janet Ajzenstat•Political Thought of Lord Durham•1988

  • Human Rights and Social Technology

    Conrad Winn, Rainer Knopff•Canadian Public Policy•1990

  • Rethinking the Constitution

    Alan C Cairns, Alan Cairns et al.•Canadian Public Policy•1997

  • Is Quebec Nationalism Just? Perspectives from Anglophone Canada

    Luc Bernier, Joseph H Carens•Canadian Public Policy•1997

  • Reconciling Parliament and Rights

    Open Access•Janet Ajzenstat•Canadian Journal of Political…•1997

  • The Moral Foundations of the American Republic

    Open Access•Marvin Meyers•Political Theory•1978

  • The politics of the millennium

    Thomas Flanagan•Terrorism and Political Violence•1995

Unique citing works13
Citations per year0,54
Citation span2002 - 2021 (20)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 13

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae