Path Dependency Reexamined
Chinese Welfare Policy in the Transition to Unemployment
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6247175 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Dorothy J Solinger (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2005 |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 83 |
| Publication date | 2005-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Comparative Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0010-4159 • E-ISSN: 2151-6227 |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/20072914 |
| OpenAlex | W2333595085 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 16 |
| References cited | 2 |
Beginning a decade ago, the Communist Party of China engineered a huge strategic shift in its stance toward its urban labor force. For more than forty years it was the party of the proletariat, governing the cities under the rubric of full, life-time employment, paired with nearly universal welfare and security1 In the mid 1990s it began to abandon the working class and even to encourage massive layoffs of work ers in the name of greater efficiency.2 In the recent era of globalization and hyper competition, left-wing parties that previously sponsored employment, job security, and benefits for workers in other countries, too?France under the Socialist Party and Mexico under the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI)?have left workers to their own devices while reducing state-dispensed social protection programs.3 In each of these cases after 1980 the ruling party, once (if in different ways) the patron of the proletariat, initiated and implemented shifts that rejected a critical component of its own social base. In China a reform agenda disavowed Mao Zedong's ideal of an egalitarian, self-sufficient, antimaterialistic China in favor of a globally involved, class-differentiated, profits-driven state/society. France's shift was not so monumental, but its deeper immersion into the European Monetary Union after 1983, with its choice to align its exchange rates more solidly with the rest of the European Community, and later its assent in 1992 to the Maastricht Treaty's goals of low deficits, smaller debt, and higher interest rates, robbed its leaders of the chance to devalue and institute disinflation when necessary to satisfy workers and sustain high employment.4 In Mexico the PRI's decision to pursue first a trade-cum investment liberalization and then a free trade agenda required austerity programs despite falling wages and bankruptcies throughout the 1980s and into the 1990s.5 Yet in each of these countries there are elements of the past that remain below the sur face
Dependency (UML · Development economics · Economic system · Economics · Labour economics · Macroeconomics · Market economy · Path (computing · Path dependency · Political science · Public economics · Transition (genetics · Unemployment · Welfare · Welfare dependency · Computer Science · Labor Movements and Unions · Social Policy and Reform Studies
A variety of capitalism … with Chinese characteristics
Development of minimum livelihood guarantee programmes in urban China
Chinese developmentalism and Nordic universalism – or the other way around? Points of convergence in Sino-Nordic income protection
The Caring State? On Rural Welfare Governance in Post-reform Vietnam and China
Labor Discontent in China in Comparative Perspective
The diffusion of international models in China’s Urban Employees’ Social Insurance
Firm Ownership and Social Insurance Inequality in Transitional China
Emptying the cage, changing the birds’
China’s Extreme Inequality
The China model withering? Institutional roots of China’s local developmentalism
Globalization and welfare spending across 21 transitional economies
Ethnic Groups at ‘Critical Junctures
Policy Entrepreneurship in C hina's Response to Urban Poverty
Sources of Authoritarian Responsiveness
Social Assistance in China, 1993–2002
Marketization beyond Neoliberalization
| Unique citing works | 16 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,84 |
| Citation span | 2007 - 2023 (17) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 16 |