The Non‐instrumental Value of Democracy
The Freedom Argument
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6249677 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Christian F Rostbøll (0000-0002-9887-0092, Department of Social Sciences, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 267-278 |
| Publication date | 2015-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Constellations (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1351-0487 • E-ISSN: 1467-8675 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/1467-8675.12159 |
| OpenAlex | W1508360589 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 12 |
A current debate in democratic theory concerns whether we can explain democratic legitimacy purely with reference to the intrinsic value of the public affirmation of equality, or whether we must invoke extra-democratic epistemic standards to do so. The freedom side of democracy is ignored or even rejected in this debate. But in order to understand the intrinsic value of democracy, we cannot ignore the relationship between freedom and democracy. Moreover, the freedom argument can better respond to the epistemic challenge to intrinsic accounts than can the equality argument. However, the freedom argument for democracy must be refined to avoid important objections to the idea that democracy can make citizens self-governing. The proposed freedom argument is based on notions of autonomy and freedom that have their root in the relational norm of not having another person as a master
Argument (complex analysis · Democracy · Econometrics · Economics · Instrumental variable · Law and economics · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Sociology · Statistics · Value (mathematics · Law · Mathematics · Medicine · Political Philosophy and Ethics
Capabilities in a Just Society
“Am I My Fellow Citizens’ Keeper?” Distrust, Democratic Backsliding, and Conspiracy Theories
Medienstrukturen revisited – die Rolle von Werten. Ein analytisches Modell zur Untersuchung des demokratiefördernden Potenzials nationaler Rechts- und Regulierungsrahmen
Democratic respect and compromise
Non-domination and democratic legitimacy
Relating to Each Other as Free and as Equals
Extrinsic Democratic Proceduralism
Social equality and the conditional justifiability of political inequality
Technocratic myopia
Kant, Freedom as Independence, and Democracy
Structural Change Through ‘Collective Action as Democratic Practice
Democracy as a utopia and democracy as a tool of domination
| Unique citing works | 12 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,09 |
| Citation span | 2015 - 2026 (12) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 12 |