Spinoza and constituent power

Bibliographic Data

ID6250441
AuthorsFilippo Del Lucchese (Brunel University of London, corresponding author)
Year2016
Volume15
Issue2
Pages182-204
Publication date2016-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueContemporary Political Theory (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1470-8914 • E-ISSN: 1476-9336
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1057/cpt.2015.39
OpenAlexW2156448007
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited24

This article considers Baruch Spinoza’s contribution to a theory of constituent power. Modern theories of constituent power generally agree on its paradoxical essence: a power that comes before the law and founds the law is at the same time a power that, once the juridical sphere is established, has to be obliterated by the law. Spinoza’s ontology has been recognised as one of the early modern sources of constituent power, yet he argues for a strict equivalence between law and power. This article argues that by reading Spinoza’s political theory through the lens of a radical immanence between ontology and history, we can understand him as a source for a theory of constituent power. It also argues that, through this immanence, Spinoza’s thought offers a solution to the paradox of constituent power and enriches contemporary discussions on the origin of juridical sphere and the relationship between politics and law

Critical theory · Epistemology · Equivalence (formal languages · Immanence · Ontology · Physics · Political philosophy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Sociology · Law · Marxism and Critical Theory · Philosophy · Political Theology and Sovereignty · Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access