Conspiracy Theories in a Networked World

Bibliographic Data

ID6251432
AuthorsDavid Singh Grewal (corresponding author)
Year2016
Volume28
Issue1
Pages24-43
Publication date2016-01-02
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueCritical Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0891-3811 • E-ISSN: 1933-8007
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/08913811.2016.1167404
OpenAlexW2338857768
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited18

The arrangements characteristic of systems of networked governance are likely to generate conspiracy theories because they rely on informal rather than formal structures of power. A formal hierarchy may be resented, but it is understood by those affected by it; in network systems, by contrast, it is often hard to determine who is in charge, even though such systems can heavily influence or even determine important social outcomes. While conspiracy theories may be motivated by many factors, in a world in which informal norms and the decisions of networked elites play a large role, we should expect to see a continued and increasing preoccupation with alleged conspiracies. Some allegations of conspiracy may even function as cognitive shortcuts—"as-if" conspiracies—which apply a cui bono style of reasoning to make sense of otherwise opaque modes of social control

Business · Control (management · Corporate governance · Economics · Epistemology · Function (biology · Hierarchy · Law and economics · Political science · Positive economics · Power (physics · Sociology · Style (visual arts · Computer Science · History · Law · Media Influence and Politics · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence · Psychology · Social Psychology · Artificial Intelligence

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub