Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The libertarian straddle

Rejoinder to Palmer and Sciabarra

Bibliographic Data

ID6251467
AuthorsJeffrey Friedman (0000-0002-3013-3950, corresponding author)
Year1998
Volume12
Issue3
Pages359-388
Publication date1998-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueCritical Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0891-3811 • E-ISSN: 1933-8007
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/08913819808443508
OpenAlexW2315902983
LanguageEN
References cited26

Palmer's defense of libertarianism as consequentialist runs afoul of his own failure to provide any consequentialist reasons for libertarian conclusions, and of his own defense of nonconsequentialist arguments for the intrinsic value of capitalism‐cum‐negative freedom. As suck, Palmer's article exemplifies the parasitic codependency of consequentialist and nonconsequentialist reasoning in libertarian thought. Sciabarra's defense of Ayn Rand's libertarianism is even more problematic, because in addition to the usual defects of libertarianism, Rand adds a commitment to ethical egoism that contradicts both her concern for the consequences of capitalism and her commitment to the rights of everyone, not just herself

Capitalism · Economics · Epistemology · Ethical egoism · Law and economics · Libertarianism · Objectivism · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Straddle · Value (mathematics · Ayn Rand and Brontë studies · Ethics in medical practice · Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations · Law · Philosophy

  • The libertarian idea

    Jan Narveson•The libertarian idea•1988

  • Capitalism and Freedom

    Milton Friedman•Capitalism and Freedom•2002

  • Persons, Rights, and the Moral Community

    Loren E Lomasky, Loren Ε Lomasky•Persons, Rights and the Moral…•1990

  • A Right to Do Wrong

    Jeremy Waldron•Ethics•1981

  • Anarchy, State and Utopia

    Robert Nozick•Essays and Reviews•2016

  • Anarchy, State, and Utopia

    Robert Nozick•Princeton Readings in Political…•2018

  • Individualism and Economic Order

    F A Hayek•Individualism and Economic Order•1996

  • The right set of simple rules

    Richard A Epstein•Critical Review•1998

  • Locke and libertarian property rights

    Am Feallsanach•Critical Review•1998

  • Are we all dialecticians now? Reply to MacGregor and Friedman

    Chris Matthew Sciabarra•Critical Review•1998

  • G. A. Cohen on self‐ownership, property, and equality

    Tom Palmer, Tom G Palmer•Critical Review•1998

  • Libertarianism, postlibertarianism, and the welfare state

    Jan Narveson•Critical Review•1992

  • Hayek, social justice, and the market

    Edward Feser•Critical Review•1998

  • The right to private property

    Tibor R Machan•Critical Review•1992

  • Dissent from “the new consensus

    Antony Flew•Critical Review•1992

  • What's not wrong with libertarianism

    Tom Palmer, Tom G Palmer•Critical Review•1998

  • On the road again

    Juliet Williams•Critical Review•1997

  • Hermeneutics and libertarianism

    Kevin P Quinn, Kevin Quinn et al.•Critical Review•1998

  • It ayn't rand

    David Macgregor•Critical Review•1997

  • What's wrong with Libertarianism

    Jeffrey Friedman•Critical Review•1997

  • The new consensus

    Jeffrey Friedman•Critical Review•1990

  • The growth of government

    Warren J Samuels•Critical Review•1993

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae