Why talk if we disagree
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6251485 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Boris Maizel (Baruch College, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2005 |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue | 1-2 |
| Pages | 1-12 |
| Publication date | 2005-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Critical Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0891-3811 • E-ISSN: 1933-8007 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/08913810508443624 |
| OpenAlex | W2093438484 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 4 |
According to a prevailing dogma of our time, real communication is practically impossible between those who have no common “cultural language.” Karl Popper disputed this widespread opinion, arguing that, while it is tremendously difficult to communicate with a real (not artificially constructed) intellectual opponent, at the same time it is infinitely fruitful to do so. He also demonstrated how, while arguing ideologically, we improve both our own ideas and the collective knowledge of our society
Adversary · Computer security · Epistemology · Ideology · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Computer Science · Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration · Law · Philosophy · Rhetoric and Communication Studies · University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,1 |
| Citation span | 2005 - 2013 (9) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |