Taking ignorance seriously

Rejoinder to critics

Bibliographic Data

ID6251997
AuthorsJeffrey Friedman (0000-0002-3013-3950, corresponding author)
Year2006
Volume18
Issue4
Pages467-532
Publication date2006-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueCritical Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0891-3811 • E-ISSN: 1933-8007
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/08913810608443673
OpenAlexW1989619520
LanguageEN
Citations received13
References cited38

In "Popper, Weber, and Hayek," I claimed that the economic and political world governed by social democracy is too complex to offer hope for rational social‐democratic policy making. I extrapolated this conclusion from the claim, made by Austrian‐school economists in the 1920s and 30s, that central economic planning would face insurmountable "knowledge problems." Israel Kirzner's Reply indicates the need to keep the Austrians' cognitivist argument conceptually distinct from more familiar incentives arguments, which can tacitly reintroduce the assumption of omniscience against which the Austrian economists rebelled. Callahan's Reply illustrates the need to keep in mind the hypothetical, conditional nature of economic arguments. Notturno's Reply changes the subject by asserting the intrinsic value of social‐democratic participation, regardless of its outcomes—even while, like Talisse's Reply, ignoring the evidence that public ignorance and elite dogmatism probably can't be mitigated by more information or by appeals to be open minded. And Hill focuses on the very real imperfections of market and other private‐sphere decision making, without weighing the shortcomings of the political alternatives. Markets and other private‐sphere decision arenas don't have to be perfect for them to improve upon public‐sector processes. In the latter, cognitive demands tend to be much greater, because of the divergence of modern social problems from the conditions that would have faced the hunter‐gatherers whose cognitive apparatus we have inherited

Argument (complex analysis · Democracy · Economics · Ignorance · Law and economics · Neoclassical economics · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Sociology · Economic Theory and Institutions · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Political Philosophy and Ethics

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub