Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Trouble With Experts

Bibliographic Data

ID6252008
AuthorsPaul J Quirk (0009-0003-3483-5057, University of British Columbia, corresponding author)
Year2010
Volume22
Issue4
Pages449-465
Publication date2010-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueCritical Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0891-3811 • E-ISSN: 1933-8007
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/08913811.2010.541699
OpenAlexW2066347686
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited12

In his justly celebrated Expert Political Judgment, Philip E. Tetlock evaluates the judgment of economic and political experts by rigorously testing their ability to make accurate predictions. He finds that ability profoundly limited, implying that expert judgment is virtually useless, if not worse. He concludes by proposing a project that would seek to improve experts' performance by holding them publicly accountable for their claims. But Tetlock's methods severely underestimate the value of expert opinion. Despite their notorious disagreements, experts have highly pertinent information and advice in many areas of public policy. The main problem with experts is that political actors seize on their most extreme views in one direction or the other, and overlook their areas of general agreement and the core of relatively reliable information that they provide

Advice (programming · Core (optical fiber · Economics · Expert opinion · Law and economics · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Public opinion · Public relations · Sociology · Value (mathematics · Computer Science · Economic Theory and Institutions · Law

  • Bounded deliberation in public committees

    Silje Maria Tellmann•Critical Policy Studies•2016

  • Political economy, media, and climate change

    Open Access•Maxwell Boykoff, Tom Yulsman•Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews…•2013

  • Second Thoughts About Expert Political Judgment

    Philip E Tetlock•Critical Review•2010

  • Three Models of Democratic Expertise

    Open Access•Alfred Moore•Perspectives on Politics•2021

  • Epistemic democracy and the role of experts

    Open Access•Cathrine Holst, Anders Molander•Contemporary Political Theory•2019

  • The Market Approach to Education

    John F Witte•The Market Approach to Education•2001

  • Minimum Wages

    David Neumark, William Wascher et al.•Minimum wages•2008

  • The base-rate fallacy in probability judgments

    Open Access•Maya Bar-Hillel, Maya Bar‐Hillel•Acta Psychologica•1980

  • Clinical versus mechanical prediction

    William M Grove, David H Zald et al.•Psychological Assessment•2000

  • The Foreign Policy Disconnect

    Benjamin I Page, Marshall M Bouton•Foreign Policy Disconnect•2006

  • The Three Trillion Dollar War

    Open Access•James M Carter•Peace & Change•2009

  • Politics, Markets and America's Schools

    John E Chubb, Terry M Moe•British Journal of Sociology of…•1991

  • The Myth of the Rational Voter

    Bryan Caplan•Princeton University Press eBooks•2008

  • Have the Experts Been Weighed, Measured, and Found Wanting

    Bryan Caplan•Critical Review•2007

  • The Financial Crisis and the Systemic Failure of the Economics Profession

    David Colander, Michael Goldberg et al.•Critical Review•2009

  • Political Appointments, Civil Service Systems, and Bureaucratic Competence

    Open Access•George A Krause, George Krause et al.•American Journal of Political…•2006

Unique citing works5
Citations per year0.31
Citation span2010 - 2021 (12)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae