Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Getting Democratic Priorities Straight

Pragmatism, Diversity, and the Role of Beliefs

Bibliographic Data

ID6252041
AuthorsPaul Gunn (0009-0008-6204-3715, corresponding author)
Year2015
Volume27
Issue2
Pages146-173
Publication date2015-04-03
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueCritical Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0891-3811 • E-ISSN: 1933-8007
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/08913811.2015.1052609
OpenAlexW2181537312
LanguageEN
References cited37

Jack Knight and James Johnson argue in The Priority of Democracy that democracy should be theorized and justified pragmatically: Democratic deliberations should be given a central coordinating role in society not because they realize any particular abstract ideal, but because they would elicit the information needed to solve real-world problems. However, Knight and Johnson rely on a naïve economic understanding of knowledge that assumes implausibly that individuals know what they need to know and need only aggregate thier separate beliefs. It is precisely because we may not know what we need to know that we need to continually test our ideas. Contra Knight and Johnson, moreover, we ought to accept that our ability to interpret social experiments properly is questionable. A pragmatic approach to social inquiry, therefore, ought to investigate what beliefs political actors actually bring to collective decisions rather than how theoretically perfect beliefs ought to be elicited and aggregated

Democracy · Diversity (politics · Economics · Epistemology · Ideal (ethics · Knight · Law and economics · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Pragmatism · Social choice theory · Sociology · Welfare economics · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Political Science Research and Education

  • The Claims of Culture

    Seyla Benhabib•Claims of Culture•2002

  • Self-Interest and Public Interest in Western Politics

    Leif Lewin, Donald Lavery•Self-interest and public interest…•1991

  • The Priority of Democracy

    Open Access•Jack Knight, James Johnson•The priority of democracy•2011

  • Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers

    Open Access•Lu Hong, Sarah E Page et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2004

  • The limited effect of economic self-interest on the political attitudes of the mass public

    Open Access•David O Sears, Carolyn L Funk•Journal of Behavioral Economics•1990

  • Democratic Reason

    Open Access•Hélène Landemore•Democratic reason•2012

  • The Fatal Conceit

    F A Hayek, W W Bartley et al.•Fatal Conceit•1988

  • The Non Sequitur of the "Dependence Effect"

    F A Von Hayek•Southern Economic Journal•1961

  • A Theory of Justice

    John Rawls•Theory of Justice•1971

  • Bourgeois Dignity

    Deirdre N Mccloskey•Bourgeois Dignity•2010

  • A Theory of Justice

    Open Access•John Rawls•Theory of Justice•1999

  • Individualism and Economic Order

    F A Hayek•Individualism and Economic Order•1996

  • Justice and the Politics of Difference

    Danielle S Allen, Iris Marion Young•Justice and the Politics of…•2012

  • ‘It Ain’t What You Say…’

    Open Access•Alan Finlayson, James Martin•British Politics•2008

  • Rivalry and Central Planning

    John Aldrich, John H Aldrich et al.•Economica•1987

  • Search” vs. “Browse”

    Anthony J Evans, Jeffrey Friedman•Critical Review•2011

  • Deliberation and disagreement

    Open Access•Hélène Landemore, Sarah E Page et al.•Politics Philosophy & Economics•2014

  • The nature of belief systems in mass publics (1964)

    Philip E Converse•Critical Review•2006

  • Same Facts, Different Interpretations

    Barry J Gaines, Brian J Gaines et al.•The Journal of Politics•2007

  • Aggregation and Deliberation

    Open Access•Jack Knight, James Johnson et al.•Political Theory•1994

  • The Politics of Motivation

    James N Druckman•Critical Review•2012

  • Deep Down

    Željka Buturović•Critical Review•2012

  • Democratic competence in normative and positive theory

    Jeffrey Friedman•Critical Review•2006

  • Hayek's Two Epistemologies and the Paradoxes of His Thought

    Jeffrey Friedman•Critical Review•2013

  • Deliberative Democracy and Political Ignorance

    Ilya Somin•Critical Review•2010

  • Political Epistemology

    Jeffrey Friedman•Critical Review•2014

  • Sources of Mass Political Disagreement

    Michael H Murakami•Critical Review•2010

  • Realistic Idealism and Classical Liberalism

    Mark Pennington•Critical Review•2014

  • Can Deliberative Democracy Be Partisan

    Russell Muirhead•Critical Review•2010

  • Democracy and the Deliberative Conceit

    Mark Pennington•Critical Review•2010

  • Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs

    Open Access•Charles S Taber, Milton Lodge•American Journal of Political…•2006

  • Inquiry into Democracy

    Jack Knight, James Johnson et al.•American Journal of Political…•1999

  • Economic Discontent and Political Behavior

    Donald R Kinder, D Roderick Kiewiet•American Journal of Political…•1979

  • Congressional Oversight Overlooked

    Mathew D Mccubbins, Thomas Schwartz•American Journal of Political…•1984

  • Sociotropic Politics

    Open Access•Donald R Kinder, D Roderick Kiewiet•British Journal of Political…•1981

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae