Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

How to Construct a Database of Liberal Democratic Performance

Bibliographic Data

ID6252806
AuthorsJ Foweraker, Roman Krznaric
Year2001
Volume8
Issue3
Pages1-25
Publication date2001-09-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueDemocratization (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1351-0347 • E-ISSN: 1743-890X
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/714000209
OpenAlexW1984186064
LanguageEN
Citations received12

Measures of democracy have multiplied over the past 20 years, but few studies explain how these measures are constructed. There is little discussion either of their conceptual underpinnings or of their composition and selection. This article aims to make the measures more transparent by examining the decisions that shaped the construction of a new Database of Liberal Democratic Performance. The Database is designed to compare the quality of democracy across 40 country cases from 1970 to 1998 inclusive, and contains 21 measures of democratic performance. The article describes three kinds of decision regarding, first, the definition of democracy, second, the objectives of the study, and third, the selection of the measures themselves. Clear objectives are a precondition of selecting appropriate measures that are fit for their purpose. The selection of measures depends not only on definition and objectives but also on the availability and quality of existing measures and raw data. Reasons are given for rejecting many of the extant measures, and the final selection is discussed and justified, measure by measure. The conclusion reflects on limitations of data and resources and assesses the potential utility of the Database

Construct (python library · Database · Democracy · Economics · Epistemology · Extant taxon · Liberal democracy · Measure (data warehouse · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Precondition · Quality (philosophy · Selection (genetic algorithm · Sociology · Computer Science · Corruption and Economic Development · Law · Political Conflict and Governance · Artificial Intelligence

  • The Uneven Performance of Third Wave Democracies

    Open Access•Joe Foweraker, Roman Krznaric•Latin American Politics and Society•2002

  • The Civil Liberty Dataset

    Open Access•Svend-Erik Skaaning•Zeitschrift für Vergleichende…•2008

  • Studying civil society across the world

    V Finn Heinrich•Journal of Civil Society•2005

  • The Democracy Barometer

    Open Access•Marc Bühlmann, Wolfgang Merkel et al.•European Political Science•2011

  • Conceptualizing and Measuring Political Inequality in a Cross-National Perspective

    Gwangeun Choi•Comparative Sociology•2021

  • Differentiating the democratic performance of the West

    Open Access•Joe Foweraker, Roman Krznaric•European Journal of Political…•2003

  • Measuring Variance in Subnational Regimes

    Open Access•Carlos Gervasoni•Journal of Politics in Latin…•2010

  • The History Manifesto

    Open Access•Jo Guldi, David Armitage•The History Manifesto•2014

  • Measuring civil liberty

    Open Access•Svend-Erik Skaaning•Revista de ciencia política•2009

  • On the limited interchangeability of rule of law measures

    Open Access•Jørgen Møller, Svend-Erik Skaaning•European Political Science Review•2011

  • The religious experience as affecting ambivalence

    Pazit Ben-Nun Bloom, Pazit Ben-Nun-Bloom et al.•Democratization•2011

  • Representando a diversidade

    Open Access•Rebecca Neaera Abers, Rebecca Abers et al.•Caderno CRH•2008

Citations per year0.5
Citation span2002 - 2021 (20)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae