Voting behaviour under doubts of ballot secrecy
Reinforcing Dominant Party Rule
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6252901 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kai Ostwald (0000-0002-9876-955X, University of British Columbia, corresponding author), Guillem Riambau (0000-0002-4076-0616, Universitat de Barcelona) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 855-874 |
| Publication date | 2023-07-04 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Democratization (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1351-0347 • E-ISSN: 1743-890X |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13510347.2023.2191191 |
| OpenAlex | W4362615328 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 33 |
Ballot secrecy is a cornerstone of electoral democracy, since its real or perceived absence can make voters reluctant to express their true preferences. Through survey data from Singapore, we show that doubts over ballot secrecy can alter voting behaviour even when the vote is secret and there are no individually-targeted punishments or incentives; specifically, they lead a small subset of Singaporean voters to support the dominant party, despite a preference for the opposition. We also examine individual-level correlates of doubting ballot secrecy: a tendency towards belief in conspiracies and distrust of the mass media are the strongest predictors. Finally, a counterfactual exercise demonstrates the sensitivity of election outcomes to marginal vote swings; it suggests that doubting ballot secrecy can secure the dominant party a small number of additional parliamentary seats, thereby buttressing dominant party rule without requiring any concerted action or overtly repressive measures
Ballot · Bullet voting · Democracy · Disapproval voting · Economics · Incentive · Law and economics · Microeconomics · Opposition (politics · Political science · Secrecy · Secret ballot · Voting · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting · Law · Psychology · Social Psychology · Socioeconomic Development in Asia
Electoral Malpractice
Liberalism Disavowed
Building inclusive democracies in Asean
Your vote is (no) secret! How low voter density hurts anonymity and biases elections in Italy
The Media, Cultural Control and Government in Singapore
Singapore
The Rise of Sophisticated Authoritarianism in Southeast Asia
The struggle for Singapore’s Chinese heartland
Explaining Elections in Singapore
Restricting Free Speech
Public housing and ethnic integration in Singapore
Violence, bribery, and fraud
The 2015 General Election and Singapore’s Political Forecast
Placebo statements in list experiments
The Misreporting Trade-Off Between List Experiments and Direct Questions in Practice
Southeast Asia
Elections Without Democracy
Why Ballot Secrecy Still Matters
An Inquiry into the Use of Illegal Electoral Practices and Effects of Political Violence and Vote-buying
Online Repression and Self-Censorship
Bringing Ideology in
Authoritarian innovations
Authoritarian Innovations
Buying, Expropriating, and Stealing Votes
Do Perceptions of Ballot Secrecy Influence Turnout? Results from a Field Experiment
The Game of Electoral Fraud and the Ousting of Authoritarian Rule
Is There a Secret Ballot? Ballot Secrecy Perceptions and Their Implications for Voting Behaviour
Gifts, threats, and perceptions of ballot secrecy in African elections
The social consequences of conspiracism
Manipulating electoral laws in Singapore
Perverse Accountability
Singapore's Pandemic Election
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,33 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2023 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |