The use of experts in building political trust
Dissenting Opinions and Critical Citizens in Times of Crisis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6252907 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Vera W H Yuen (0000-0002-0141-821X, Faculty of Business and Economics, HKU, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 7 |
| Pages | 1291-1312 |
| Publication date | 2023-10-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Democratization (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1351-0347 • E-ISSN: 1743-890X |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13510347.2023.2227572 |
| OpenAlex | W4382940015 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 85 |
Under COVID-19 emergency decrees, countries imposed freedom-restricting measures that health experts endorsed to contain the disease. There has been debates about whether the pandemic has led to the backsliding of democratic standards and the promotion of illiberal and authoritarian practices. This study conducted a survey in Hong Kong, a non-democracy. At the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, the government postponed an election widely expected to be won by the opposition. This study explores whether health experts' opinions could affect public support for postponement of a regular election and government trustworthiness. It finds that neither health experts' affirmation nor negation increased support for the postponement, but rejecting the government mandate reduced government trustworthiness while affirming it did not. The negative opinions thus had asymmetric information value against affirmative opinions in a known-censored environment. This channel operates through democrats in Hong Kong, who are critical citizens of the regime. The strategy of silencing dissent would be cost-effective for preserving political trust while engaging experts to support the mandates appeared unhelpful. This study contributes to understanding the use of experts in influencing political trust within an authoritarian setting.KEYWORDS: Expertselectionpolitical trustrepressioncritical citizensdissentspublic opinionauthoritarian regimescensorshipinformation value Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsVera W. H. YuenVera W. H. Yuen is a Lecturer in the Faculty of Business and Economics at the University of Hong Kong. Her interests include political economy, authoritarian politics, and public health. She has been involved in public policy-making and has written advocacy papers with think tanks on areas such as housing, retirement protection, the labour market, and media regulation. She has also sat on several government boards related to housing, broadcasting, security, education, and culture
Authoritarianism · Business · Democracy · Disinformation · Dissent · Dissenting opinion · Government (linguistics · Mandate · Misinformation · Opposition (politics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Postponement · Public relations · Social media · Sociology · Disaster Management and Resilience · Law · Populism, Right-Wing Movements · Public Administration · Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
Singapore as Model
Use (and abuse) of expert elicitation in support of decision making for public policy
Source effects in communication and persuasion research
Elusive consensus
Pandemics meet democracy. Experimental evidence from the Covid-19 crisis in Spain
Survey Questions
Pandemic control and public evaluation of government performance in Hong Kong
Public justification and expert disagreement over non-pharmaceutical interventions for the Covid-19 pandemic
The hydroxychloroquine alliance
Comparative Hong Kong Politics
Princes, Brokers, and Bureaucrats
The Cultural Logic of Politics in Mainland China and Taiwan
Unlikely Partners
The Honest Broker
Perception of Hazards
Reliance on scientists and experts during an epidemic
A tale of two city-states
Hybrid Politics and New Competitiveness
The function of expert involvement in China's local policy making
Political Legitimacy in Singapore
Praise from the International Community
Revisiting Political Wariness in China’s Public Opinion Surveys
The Tyranny of Experts
Avoiding the Hypothetical
Public opinion, international reputation, and audience costs in an authoritarian regime
Trust in government increased during the Covid‐19 pandemic in Australia and New Zealand
Revisiting demand, politicization and externalization in authoritarian political regimes
The Problem of Expertise in Knowledge Societies
Popular Support for Village Self-Government in China
Administrative Absorption of Politics in Hong Kong
Repoliticising depoliticisation
The public policy of the European Union
Names from Nowhere? Fictitious Country Names in Survey Vignettes Affect Experimental Results
Brief History of Neoliberalism
Adviser to The King
Corruption and Trust
Is Putin’s popularity real
Welfare or politics? A survey experiment of political discontent and support for redistribution in Hong Kong
Common Sense as a Political Weapon
Popular Political Support in Urban China
The Puzzle of Authoritarian Legitimacy
The Rise of “Localism” in Hong Kong
The Rassemblement National and Covid-19
Information Dilemmas and Blame‐Avoidance Strategies
Technocratic attitudes in Covid‐19 times
In-between liberal authoritarianism and electoral authoritarianism
The autocratic bias
Conditional impact of facebook as an information source on political opinions
In Search of Self-Censorship
Supervision by Public Opinion” or by Government Officials? Media Criticism and Central-Local Government Relations in China
The "New Normal" and "Pandemic Populism
Neoliberalism and Geography
Resource disparity and multi-level elections in competitive authoritarian regimes
First-Hand Experience and Second-Hand Information
The French public's attitudes to a future Covid-19 vaccine
Pandemic backsliding
State rhetoric, nationalism and public opinion in China
When to Worry about Sensitivity Bias
Embracing Scientific Decision Making
Hong Kong After the Sino-British Agreement
"Red and Expert" and China's Cultural Revolution
Tackling Covid-19 risk in Hong Kong
Secondary Trauma or Secondary Disaster? Insights From Hurricane Katrina
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2025 (2) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |