Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The use of experts in building political trust

Dissenting Opinions and Critical Citizens in Times of Crisis

Bibliographic Data

ID6252907
AuthorsVera W H Yuen (0000-0002-0141-821X, Faculty of Business and Economics, HKU, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume30
Issue7
Pages1291-1312
Publication date2023-10-03
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueDemocratization (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1351-0347 • E-ISSN: 1743-890X
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13510347.2023.2227572
OpenAlexW4382940015
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited85

Under COVID-19 emergency decrees, countries imposed freedom-restricting measures that health experts endorsed to contain the disease. There has been debates about whether the pandemic has led to the backsliding of democratic standards and the promotion of illiberal and authoritarian practices. This study conducted a survey in Hong Kong, a non-democracy. At the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, the government postponed an election widely expected to be won by the opposition. This study explores whether health experts' opinions could affect public support for postponement of a regular election and government trustworthiness. It finds that neither health experts' affirmation nor negation increased support for the postponement, but rejecting the government mandate reduced government trustworthiness while affirming it did not. The negative opinions thus had asymmetric information value against affirmative opinions in a known-censored environment. This channel operates through democrats in Hong Kong, who are critical citizens of the regime. The strategy of silencing dissent would be cost-effective for preserving political trust while engaging experts to support the mandates appeared unhelpful. This study contributes to understanding the use of experts in influencing political trust within an authoritarian setting.KEYWORDS: Expertselectionpolitical trustrepressioncritical citizensdissentspublic opinionauthoritarian regimescensorshipinformation value Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsVera W. H. YuenVera W. H. Yuen is a Lecturer in the Faculty of Business and Economics at the University of Hong Kong. Her interests include political economy, authoritarian politics, and public health. She has been involved in public policy-making and has written advocacy papers with think tanks on areas such as housing, retirement protection, the labour market, and media regulation. She has also sat on several government boards related to housing, broadcasting, security, education, and culture

Authoritarianism · Business · Democracy · Disinformation · Dissent · Dissenting opinion · Government (linguistics · Mandate · Misinformation · Opposition (politics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Postponement · Public relations · Social media · Sociology · Disaster Management and Resilience · Law · Populism, Right-Wing Movements · Public Administration · Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies

  • The critical online diasporic infosphere and counter-public sustenance in an autocratizing society

    Open Access•Francis Lee, Chun Hong Tse•Information Communication & Society•2025

  • Perceived government-expert discord and evaluation of Covid-19 policies in Hong Kong

    Open Access•Francis Lee, Annisa Lee•Journal of Asian Public Policy•2024

  • From public health to political repression

    Open Access•Vera W H Yuen•Social Science & Medicine•2024

  • White privilege, ethnic disadvantage, and stigmatized linguistic capital

    Open Access•Vera W H Yuen•Social Science & Medicine•2024

  • Singapore as Model

    Open Access•Chua Beng Huat•Worlding Cities•2011

  • Use (and abuse) of expert elicitation in support of decision making for public policy

    Open Access•Michael G Morgan•Proceedings of the National…•2014

  • Source effects in communication and persuasion research

    Open Access•Elizabeth J Wilson, Daniel L Sherrell•Journal of the Academy of…•1993

  • Elusive consensus

    Open Access•Jon Green, Jared F Edgerton et al.•Science Advances•2020

  • Pandemics meet democracy. Experimental evidence from the Covid-19 crisis in Spain

    Francesc Amat, Andreu Arenas et al.•2020

  • Survey Questions

    Jean M Converse, Jean Converse et al.•Survey Questions•1986

  • Pandemic control and public evaluation of government performance in Hong Kong

    Francis Lee•Chinese Journal of Communication•2022

  • Public justification and expert disagreement over non-pharmaceutical interventions for the Covid-19 pandemic

    Open Access•Marcus Dahlquist, Henrik D Kugelberg•Journal of Medical Ethics•2023

  • The hydroxychloroquine alliance

    Open Access•Guilherme Casarões, David Magalhães•Revista de Administração Pública•2021

  • Comparative Hong Kong Politics

    Open Access•Mathew Y H Wong•Comparative Hong Kong Politics•2017

  • Princes, Brokers, and Bureaucrats

    Steffen Hertog•Princes, Brokers, and Bureaucrats•2011

  • The Cultural Logic of Politics in Mainland China and Taiwan

    Open Access•Tianjian Shi•Cultural Logic of Politics in…•2014

  • Unlikely Partners

    Julian Gewirtz•Unlikely Partners•2017

  • The Honest Broker

    Open Access•Roger A Pielke, Jr Roger A Pielke•Honest Broker•2007

  • Perception of Hazards

    Open Access•Michael Siegrist, George Cvetkovich•Risk Analysis•2000

  • Reliance on scientists and experts during an epidemic

    Open Access•Pietro Battiston, Ridhi Kashyap et al.•SSM - Population Health•2020

  • A tale of two city-states

    Open Access•Shingheirobin Yuen, Edmund W Cheng et al.•Global Public Health•2021

  • Hybrid Politics and New Competitiveness

    Open Access•William Case•East Asia•2008

  • The function of expert involvement in China's local policy making

    Open Access•Yongdong Shen, Meng U Ieong et al.•Politics & Policy•2021

  • Political Legitimacy in Singapore

    Open Access•Benjamin Wong, Xunming Huang•Politics & Policy•2010

  • Praise from the International Community

    Kecheng Fang•The China Journal•2021

  • Revisiting Political Wariness in China’s Public Opinion Surveys

    Xuchuan Lei, Jie Lu•Journal of Contemporary China•2016

  • The Tyranny of Experts

    Open Access•Karen Del Biondo•European Journal of Development…•2014

  • Avoiding the Hypothetical

    Open Access•Jared Mcdonald•International Journal of Public…•2019

  • Public opinion, international reputation, and audience costs in an authoritarian regime

    Open Access•Xiaojun Li, Dingding Chen•Conflict Management and Peace…•2020

  • Trust in government increased during the Covid‐19 pandemic in Australia and New Zealand

    Open Access•Shaun Goldfinch, Ross Taplin et al.•Australian Journal of Public…•2021

  • Revisiting demand, politicization and externalization in authoritarian political regimes

    Nina Belyaeva•Policy Studies•2019

  • The Problem of Expertise in Knowledge Societies

    Open Access•Reiner Grundmann•Minerva•2016

  • Popular Support for Village Self-Government in China

    Jie Chen•Asian Survey•2005

  • Administrative Absorption of Politics in Hong Kong

    Ambrose Yeo-Chi King, Ambrose Y C King•Asian Survey•1975

  • Repoliticising depoliticisation

    B Jessop•Policy & Politics•2014

  • The public policy of the European Union

    Claudio M Radaelli•Journal of European Public Policy•1999

  • Names from Nowhere? Fictitious Country Names in Survey Vignettes Affect Experimental Results

    Open Access•Jacklyn Majnemer, Gustav Meibauer•International Studies Quarterly•2022

  • Brief History of Neoliberalism

    Desley J Harvey, David Harvey et al.•BRIEF HISTORY OF NEOLIBERALISM.•2005

  • Adviser to The King

    Open Access•Calvert W Jones•World Politics•2019

  • Corruption and Trust

    Eric C C Chang, Yun-Han Chu et al.•The Journal of Politics•2006

  • Is Putin’s popularity real

    Timothy Frye, Scott Gehlbach et al.•Post-Soviet Affairs•2017

  • Welfare or politics? A survey experiment of political discontent and support for redistribution in Hong Kong

    Open Access•Mathew Y H Wong•Politics•2020

  • Common Sense as a Political Weapon

    Open Access•Christian Staerklé, Matteo Cavallaro et al.•Political Psychology•2022

  • Popular Political Support in Urban China

    Open Access•Steven W Lewis•Perspectives on Politics•2005

  • The Puzzle of Authoritarian Legitimacy

    Open Access•Andrew J Nathan•Journal of democracy•2020

  • The Rise of “Localism” in Hong Kong

    Open Access•Malte Philipp Kaeding•Journal of democracy•2017

  • The Rassemblement National and Covid-19

    Open Access•Caterina Froio•Government and Opposition•2024

  • Information Dilemmas and Blame‐Avoidance Strategies

    Open Access•Erik Baekkeskov, Oliver Rubin et al.•Governance•2017

  • Technocratic attitudes in Covid‐19 times

    Open Access•Sebastián Lavezzolo, Luis Ramiro et al.•European Journal of Political…•2022

  • In-between liberal authoritarianism and electoral authoritarianism

    Brian C H Fong, Brian Fong•Democratization•2017

  • The autocratic bias

    Open Access•Marcus Tannenberg•Democratization•2022

  • Conditional impact of facebook as an information source on political opinions

    Francis Lee, Paul S N Lee et al.•Asian Journal of Political Science•2017

  • In Search of Self-Censorship

    Open Access•Xiaoxiao Shen, Rory Truex•British Journal of Political…•2021

  • Supervision by Public Opinion” or by Government Officials? Media Criticism and Central-Local Government Relations in China

    Open Access•Dan Chen•Modern China•2017

  • The "New Normal" and "Pandemic Populism

    Open Access•Ulrike M Vieten•Social Sciences•2020

  • Neoliberalism and Geography

    Open Access•Simon Springer•Geography Compass•2010

  • Resource disparity and multi-level elections in competitive authoritarian regimes

    Stan Hok-Wui Wong•Electoral Studies•2014

  • First-Hand Experience and Second-Hand Information

    Open Access•Gina Yannitell Reinhardt•Review of Policy Research•2015

  • The French public's attitudes to a future Covid-19 vaccine

    Open Access•Jeremy K Ward, Caroline Alleaume et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2020

  • Pandemic backsliding

    Open Access•Amanda B Edgell, Jean Lachapelle et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2021

  • State rhetoric, nationalism and public opinion in China

    Open Access•Rachel Neo, Ric Neo et al.•International Affairs•2022

  • When to Worry about Sensitivity Bias

    Open Access•Graham Blair, Alexander Coppock et al.•American Political Science Review•2020

  • Embracing Scientific Decision Making

    Lan Xue, Xufeng Zhu et al.•Pacific Affairs•2018

  • Hong Kong After the Sino-British Agreement

    Lau Siu-Kai, Lau Siu‐kai et al.•Pacific Affairs•1986

  • "Red and Expert" and China's Cultural Revolution

    Dennis M Ray, Dennis Ray•Pacific Affairs•1970

  • Tackling Covid-19 risk in Hong Kong

    Open Access•Raymond Kh Chan•Current Sociology•2021

  • Secondary Trauma or Secondary Disaster? Insights From Hurricane Katrina

    Duane A Gill•Sociological Spectrum•2007

Unique citing works4
Citations per year2
Citation span2024 - 2025 (2)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae