Territorial threat and women’s legislative representation

Datos Bibliográficos

ID6252949
AutoresAlice J Kang (0000-0001-5443-8356, University of Nebraska–Lincoln), Nam Kyu Kim (0000-0003-0621-4192, Korea University, autor de correspondencia)
Año2020
Volumen27
Número2
Páginas340-358
Fecha de publicación2020-02-17
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaDemocratization (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1351-0347 • E-ISSN: 1743-890X
EditorialInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13510347.2019.1700953
OpenAlexW2997573857
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas7
Referencias citadas61

Why do some countries have fewer women in parliament than do others? Recent studies find that women have less access to positions of political power in countries facing external threats. Existing studies, however, do not differentiate between types of threat. We theorize that territorial threats are a particular driver of gender inequality in national parliaments. When a country's land is under threat, people prefer having "tough" representatives in the national legislature who are competent on the military and defence more so than when a country faces other threats. Moreover, when countries face territorial threats, they build larger standing armies and adopt military conscription, raising the level of militarization in society, which negatively influences women's access to the national legislature. Using a time-series cross-sectional data set of 101 democracies, we find that countries facing external territorial threats have lower percentages of women in parliament compared to countries facing other or no external threats. Additionally, we find that countries with higher levels of militarization have fewer women in the national legislature

Development economics · Economics · Legislature · Militarization · Parliament · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Sociology · Gender Diversity and Inequality · Gender Politics and Representation · Gender, Security, and Conflict · Law