Towards a universal framework for democracy assessment
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6253399 |
|---|---|
| Authors | David Beetham (National Audit Office, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2004 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 1-17 |
| Publication date | 2004-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Democratization (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1351-0347 • E-ISSN: 1743-890X |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13510340412331294182 |
| OpenAlex | W2049724952 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 30 |
Assessing the state or quality of a country's democracy has become an increasingly widespread undertaking over the past ten years, whether to construct league tables of democratic attainment, to explore correlations between democracy and economic condition or performance, or to identify likely recipients and projects for international aid. This article reports on a civil society-based programme and framework for democracy assessment in which the author has been involved, whose purpose is to contribute to public debate about a country's democracy, to monitor its progress over time, and to identify pressing areas for reform. Distinctive features of the methodology are the derivation of assessment criteria from clearly articulated democratic values, its relevance to new and established democracies alike, and the comprehensiveness of the assessment framework, covering citizen rights and the rule of law, institutions of representative and accountable government, civil society and participation, and international dimensions of democracy. The article explores the intellectual underpinnings of the assessment methodology in the universal validity of democratic norms and a common imperative for democratization in developed as well as developing countries; and argues for the framework's usefulness in teaching as well as research. It concludes with a brief report on the comparative findings from pilot assessments undertaken with in-country partners in eight countries from across the world. Keywords: Democracy AssessmentDemocratic Audit
Democracy · Epistemology · Law and economics · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · Law · Ombudsman and Human Rights · Philosophy
Democracy, Professions and Societal Constitutionalism
A drunken guest in Europe
Configurations of democracy—empirical and methodological insights from a comparison of Singapore, Ghana, and Ireland
Why Choice Matters
On the Distinct Effects of Left-Wing and Right-Wing Populism on Democratic Quality
Studying civil society across the world
Confucian Culture and Democratic Values
Democratic Assessment of Collaborative Planning Processes
Holding the Line
Elections, International Observers and the Politicisation of Democratic Values
Economic Change and Public Support for Democracy in China and Russia
How ‘just’ is hybrid governance of urban nature-based solutions
Central Asia
Democratic Accountability and Metropolitan Governance
Transition to Democracy or Hybrid Regime? The Dynamics and Outcomes of Democratization in Myanmar
Evaluating Democratic Governance
Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy
Human Security Analysis as a Framework for Value-Oriented Governance
Judging elections and election management quality by process
Evaluating Democratic Performance
E-democracy
Procedural quality only? Taiwanese democracy reconsidered
The Quality of Democracy
Using international law to assess elections
A framework for the systematic study of election quality
The contradictions of democratization by force
The protective and developmental varieties of liberal democracy
Mission or Empire, Word or Sword? The Human Capital Legacy in Postcolonial Democratic Development
Decolonising Clientelism
Inequality and Political Representation in the Philippines and Singapore
| Unique citing works | 30 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,36 |
| Citation span | 2004 - 2024 (21) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 30 |