When handpicked successors of charismatic leaders prosper
The surprising success of Juan Manuel Santos in Colombia
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6253965 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Caitlin Andrews-Lee (0000-0001-5661-5213, Toronto Metropolitan University), Laura Gamboa (0000-0002-4873-1764, Department of Political Science, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 1116-1136 |
| Publication date | 2022-08-18 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Democratization (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1351-0347 • E-ISSN: 1743-890X |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13510347.2022.2033971 |
| OpenAlex | W4210449932 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 24 |
Charismatic leaders, who loathe sharing power, often anoint sycophantic successors who fail to become powerful leaders in their own right. Curiously, however, Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos (2010–2018), the handpicked successor of Alvaro Uribe (2002–2010), became a remarkably effective leader who served two terms and oversaw Colombia’s landmark 2016 peace agreement. We investigate this unlikely outcome and develop a novel theory to reveal a pathway through which some handpicked successors of charismatic leaders can establish independent authority. We argue that success is more likely when the successor breaks away from the predecessor. However, doing so requires the successor to engage in a sequential and highly strategic process we label tightrope walking, in which the new leader gains the predecessor’s endorsement to win office, expands his/her coalition by incorporating new allies from outside the predecessor’s base, and reforms the predecessor’s unsustainable policies and narrative. To substantiate our theory, we trace how Santos moved through each stage of the tightrope-walking process and ultimately broke from Uribe to achieve independent authority. The results suggest a rare but important mechanism through which charismatic movements can be challenged from the inside out, curtailing or reversing democratic erosion.KEYWORDS: Charismaleadershippolitical successiondemocratic erosionColombiaJuan Manuel SantosAlvaro Uribepeace agreement AcknowledgmentsWe wish to thank Carlos Gervasoni, Murat Somer, Elizabeth Zechmeister, Kenneth Roberts, Tiffany Barnes, James McGuire, and two anonymous reviewers for their comments on a previous version of this article. We are also grateful to the participants of the University of Utah's Center for Latin American Studies faculty seminar.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationNotes on contributorsCaitlin Andrews-LeeCaitlin Andrews-Lee is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Politics and Public Administration at Ryerson University in Toronto. Previously, she was a Post-Doctoral Fellow at Tulane University's Center for Inter-American Policy and Research (CIPR) and received her Ph.D. in Government from the University of Texas at Austin. Her research and published work focuses on charismatic leadership, political identity and behavior, political movements and parties, democracy, and multi-method research, with a regional emphasis on Latin America. For more information, please see: https://www.caitlinandrewslee.comLaura GamboaLaura Gamboa is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of Utah. She has a PhD in Political Science from the University of Notre Dame and a M.A. in Latin American Studies from the University of Texas at Austin. Her research focuses on regimes and regime change, democratic institutions, and voting behavior. Her forthcoming book analyzes opposition strategies against the erosion of democracy in Colombia and Venezuela. For more information, please see: https://www.laura-gamboa.com
Centralized government · Charisma · Charismatic authority · Democracy · Narrative · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Sociology · Successor cardinal · Law · Philosophy · Political Conflict and Governance · Politics and Society in Latin America · Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Economy and Society
Do New Leaders Make a Difference?
The Process of Political Succession
Corte al Congreso
Political leadership for peace processes
Toward a Theory of Personalist Parties
Ambitious Reform Via Constituent Assemblies
Who Says “It’s the Economy”? Cross-National and Cross-Individual Variation in the Salience of Economic Performance
The resilience of the Latin American right
The Populist Road to Market Reform
Porque te quiero te apoyo
Political Leadership as Social Capital
When Power Changes Hands
Hard acts to follow
Latin America
Colombia’s Surprising Resilience
The Peace Process and Colombia’s Elections
Opposition at the Margins
Inside Revolutionary Parties
The Emergence and Revival of Charismatic Movements
Missionary Politics - A Contribution to the Study of Populism
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2025 (2) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |