The United States' approach to Algeria's civil conflict

The United States' approach to Algeria's civil conflict has been based on the stringent assumption that a choice must be made between a secular government that is prowestern (although corrupt and repressive) and an Islamist regime that is anti-western (although equally repressive if allowed to govern). The article shows that this approach not only works to sustain authoritarianism in Algeria and reinforce a vicious cycle of poverry and civil violence, but also ignores the causal links between the practice of dictatorship in the country and the rise of anti-American violence. In this sense, America's foreign policy towards Algeria is a contributory factor to transnational terrorism. An alternative approach that is based on economic development and democracy promotion is proposed here to achieve sustainable democracy and internal peace in Algeria and weaken the forces that give rise to antiAmerican violence

Authoritarianism · Civil Conflict · Civil society · Cycle of violence · Democracy · Democracy promotion · Democratization · Development economics · Dictatorship · Domestic violence · Economics · Internal conflict · Internal security · Poison control · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Spanish Civil War · Suicide prevention · Terrorism · Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics · Law · Political Conflict and Governance · Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East