Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Hobbes’s hidden monster

A new interpretation of the frontispiece of Leviathan

Bibliographic Data

ID6259913
AuthorsMagnus Kristiansson (Uppsala University), Johan Tralau (Uppsala University)
Year2014
Volume13
Issue3
Pages299-320
Publication date2014-07-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEuropean Journal of Political Theory (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1474-8851 • E-ISSN: 1741-2730
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/1474885113491954
OpenAlexW1992390749
LanguageEN
Citations received13
References cited1

In recent years, much work has been done on the role of images in Hobbes. But there is an unsolved riddle with regard to the famous frontispiece of Leviathan (1651). Why is there nothing monstrous in the sovereign body depicted, despite the fact that it is named for a Biblical sea monster? In this article it is argued that there is a monster just barely hidden in the image and that the iconographical tradition helps us rediscover this creature. We argue that this monstrosity serves a theoretical and political purpose pertaining to fear and imagery within Hobbes’s overall project and in the political context of his time. Moreover, we argue that the discovery of the hitherto unknown monster should make political theory and intellectual history sensitive to the role played by physical images in Hobbes as well as in political thought at large

Archaeology · Art · Context (archaeology · Epistemology · Interpretation (philosophy · LEVIATHAN (cipher · Literature · Monster · Nothing · Political philosophy · Political science · Politics · Sovereignty · History · Law · Philosophy · Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought

  • Hobbes y sus monstruos

    Open Access•Gonzalo Bustamante Kuschel•Las Torres de Lucca. International…•2026

  • Meek’s Cutoff , Hobbes and the Ambiguities of Political Foundation

    Open Access•Christopher M Holman•Film-Philosophy•2025

  • Life, Death, and the Political

    Open Access•Vladimir Brodskiy•Sociology of power•2023

  • Sight Unseen

    Open Access•Bruce Buchan•Cultural Studies Review•2018

  • Jurisdictional Culture and Memory Digitization of the “Government of Justice.” Data Modeling and Digital Approach for the Legal History of Ibero-America

    Open Access•Victor Gayol, Jairo Antonio Melo Flórez•Culture & History Digital Journal•2018

  • From I Samuel 8 to Genesis 1

    Meirav Jones•Political Theology•2024

  • Hobbes’ Frontispiece

    Open Access•J Richardson•Law and Critique•2015

  • Masculine Power? A Gendered Look at the Frontispiece of Hobbes's Leviathan

    Open Access•Joanne Boucher•Hypatia•2021

  • The puzzle of the sovereign’s smile and the inner complexity of Hobbes’s theory of authorisation

    Open Access•Eva Odzuck, Eva Helene Odzuck•History of European Ideas•2024

  • The scholastic’s dilemma

    Allan Gabriel Cardoso dos Santos•History of European Ideas•2024

  • Representing gross domestic product

    Open Access•Jonny Bunning•Cultural Dynamics•2016

  • Shape-Shifting Representation

    Open Access•Michael Saward•American Political Science Review•2014

  • Hobbes and Hats

    Open Access•Teresa M Bejan•American Political Science Review•2023

  • Armour and Masculinity in the Italian Renaissance

    Carolyn Springer•Armor and Masculinity in the…•2010

Citations per year1.08
Citation span2014 - 2026 (13)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae