Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Schröder's Last Campaign

An Analysis of the 2005 Bundestag Election in Context

Bibliographic Data

ID6263109
AuthorsAndreas M Wüst (0000-0002-0355-0580, Mannheim Centre for European Social Research), Dieter Roth (0000-0003-1467-8966, Heidelberg University)
Year2006
Volume15
Issue4
Pages439-459
Publication date2006-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueGerman Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0964-4008 • E-ISSN: 1743-8993
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/09644000601062584
OpenAlexW2080949550
LanguageEN
Citations received2

At the end of May 2005, it seemed the (early) Bundestag election scheduled for September of that year would lead to a complete change of power in Germany. The Red-Green government's reforms came late and had been ineffective in the short run, and several setbacks during the first months of 2005 caused Chancellor Gerhard Schröder to call an early election. Yet, elections are won or lost on election day, and not in opinion polls. Thanks to an intensive campaign, the SPD and especially Schröder were able to mobilise and to activate their social and political support base better than expected, but they lost parts of their left wing to the Linkspartei formed by PDS and the SPD-breakaway WASG. The CDU/CSU and Angela Merkel ran a mediocre campaign, probably because some Christian Democrats thought the election would be won anyway. In addition, the Christian Democrats made the mistake of elevating taxation to the status of a major campaign issue by nominating Paul Kirchhof, a highly polarising law professor for the post of finance minister. This unwise move enabled the SPD to campaign negatively on the person and the CDU/CSU tax proposals that were anything but clear. In the end the SPD lost, but not as badly as previously expected. More surprisingly, the CDU/CSU lost votes as well. The winners were the small parties, especially the FDP and the Linkspartei. The losers, the major catch-all parties, were more or less forced to form a Grand Coalition. On the one hand, this coalition will make it more difficult for both CDU/CSU and SPD to regenerate and to sharpen their political profiles. On the other hand, the agenda powers enjoyed by the governing parties should not be underestimated in their effect. Therefore, predicting the end of the major catch-all parties would be pre-mature at this point

Ballot · Context (archaeology · Economic history · Economics · General election · Government (linguistics · Mistake · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Sociology · Voting · European Monetary and Fiscal Policies · European Union Policy and Governance · History · Law · Social Policy and Reform Studies

  • Weblog Campaigning in the German Bundestag Election 2005

    Open Access•Steffen Albrecht, Maren Lübcke et al.•Social Science Computer Review•2007

  • Veto Players and Welfare State Change

    Open Access•Thomas Däubler•Journal of Social Policy•2008

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,11
Citation span2007 - 2008 (2)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae