The technocratic tendencies of economists in government bureaucracy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6264751 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Johan Christensen (0000-0002-2582-7827, Leiden University, corresponding author), Ronen Mandelkern (0000-0002-4213-9313, Tel Aviv University) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 233-257 |
| Publication date | 2022-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Governance (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0952-1895 • E-ISSN: 1468-0491 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/gove.12578 |
| OpenAlex | W3127850159 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 16 |
| References cited | 30 |
Economists are by many accounts the most influential group of experts in contemporary political decision‐making. While the literature on the power of economists mostly focuses on the policy ideas of economic experts, some recent studies suggest that economists also hold particular technocratic ideas about the policy process. The article systematically tests this argument. Focusing on economists within government bureaucracy, the study is based on a quantitative analysis of a large‐scale survey of Norwegian ministerial civil servants. It finds that economists are more likely to hold technocratic role perceptions than officials with other educational backgrounds only if they work in the finance ministry or in higher administrative grades. The findings contribute to scholarship on the political sway of economists and to debates about technocracy and the technocratic views of civil servants
Argument (complex analysis · Bureaucracy · Civil servants · Economics · Government (linguistics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Power (physics · Rationality · Scholarship · Sociology · Technocracy · Law · Political and Economic history of UK and US · Public Administration · Public Policy and Administration Research · Social Policy and Reform Studies
The public and private values of sector-switchers
Enhancing civil servant career development
Ideas and the changing relationship between states and markets in social policy
Constructing a Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau Greater Bay Area social space
Expertise, Policy-making and Democracy
Guardians and Spenders in the Budgetary Process
The organisation of evaluations
Comparing ministerial evidence cultures
The power of folk ideas in economic policy and the central bank–commercial bank analogy
Special section introduction
Policy Design Below the Political Radar
The differential impact of evidence types in policy decisions
Between a rock and a hard place
Public sector workers' support for technocracy. Comparative evidence from 25 European countries
How technocratic is the power elite? A new approach and evidence from a mixed-method study of the Danish power elite
Introducing ‘ministerial politics
Ruling Ideas
The Currency of Ideas
The Politics of Public Service Bargains
From Economics Imperialism to Freakonomics
The Power of Economists within the State
The National Origins of Policy Ideas
Translating social investment ideas in Israel
The professional politics of the austerity debate
Will vs. Reason
The Bocconi boys go to Brussels
Explaining Political Tunnel Vision
The Ubiquitous Rise of Economists
OUP accepted manuscript
The power of economic ideas – through, over and in – political time
Powering ideas through expertise
Bureaucratic dilemmas
Civil Servants, Economic Ideas, and Economic Policies
Elite Transformation in Advanced Industrial Societies
What Makes a Technocrat
Economists and Societies
Shifting Knowledge Regimes
From Economic to Social Regulation
Do economists make policies? On the political effects of economics
The Superiority of Economists
Neoliberal ideas of government and the political empowerment of economists in advanced nation-states
Managing Mexico
Economists, Capitalists, and the Making of Globalization
The Construction of a Global Profession
Economization, part 1
| Unique citing works | 16 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 4 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 16 |