Understanding the Modern Election Campaign
Analysing Campaign Eras through Financial Transparency Disclosures at the 2019 UK General Election
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6267154 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Katharine Dommett (0000-0003-0624-6610, University of Sheffield, corresponding author), Sam Power (0000-0001-5803-2660, University of Sussex), Andrew Barclay (0000-0001-7154-218X, Oxford Policy Management), Amber Macintyre (0009-0003-0229-7303) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 60 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 141-167 |
| Publication date | 2025-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Government and Opposition (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0017-257X • E-ISSN: 1477-7053 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/gov.2024.3 |
| OpenAlex | W4392653564 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 48 |
What do modern election campaigns look like? According to the most recent accounts, they are data-driven operations in which extensive data are collected and targeted messages are deployed in efforts to maximize support. Whilst highlighting important new developments, in this article we argue that a focus on novel practices offers a distorted picture of modern campaigns. Presenting a unique analysis of over 22,720 separate items of expenditure made by political parties at the 2019 UK general election, we demonstrate that whilst there is some evidence of a ‘fourth’ era of campaigning, these novel practices do not define campaigns. Taking a more holistic approach that examines how campaign activities are blended and entwined, we offer unprecedented insight into the nature of modern campaigns, revealing variation in parties' campaign strategies. We also introduce a new dataset for those interested in party campaigns and call for others to pursue a more holistic analysis
Business · Campaign finance · General election · Political science · Politics · Transparency (behavior · Accounting · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Populism, Right-Wing Movements
The fourth age of political communication
Democratic Phoenix
Campaigning in the fourth age of political communication. A multi-method study on the use of Facebook by German and Austrian parties in the 2013 national election campaigns
Hacking the Electorate
Billboards and Turnout
Scientific and subversive
Changing Campaign Communications
Stretched But Not Snapped’
We power democracy”
Political advertising
Mass-Observation, Market Research, and the Birth of the Focus Group, 1937–1997
Ground Wars
In varietate concordia?! Political parties’ digital political marketing in the 2019 European Parliament election campaign
Separation by Television Program
Public understanding of Electoral Spending
Monitoring digital election campaigns
The Impact of Electoral Context on the Electoral Effectiveness of District-Level Campaigning
Effects of Party Organization on Performance during the ‘Golden Age’ of Parties
Data-driven campaigning and democratic disruption
Measuring the Professionalization of Political Campaigning
Popularity equilibrium
Mobilizing or Chasing Voters on Facebook? Analysing Echo-Chamber Effects at the UK Parliamentary General Election 2019
Manipulating Citizens
The Uneasy Relationship between Empirical and Normative Types in Consociational Theory
Why it Is Indeed Time for the Westminster Model to Be Retired from Comparative Politics
The Muddle of the ‘Westminster Model
The Effectiveness of Local Party Campaigns in 2005
Hanging on the Telephone? Doorstep and Telephone Canvassing at the British General Election of 1997
Methodology of Social Sciences
The old in the new
Political Campaigns and Big Data
Campaign styles
Parties' voter targeting strategies
Political Parties and Electoral Mobilization
Political Advertising Online and Offline
Issues, Candidate Image, and Priming
| Citations per year | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |