Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Digital Authoritarianism and the Global Technology Industry

Evidence from Iran

Bibliographic Data

ID6267486
AuthorsDara Conduit (0000-0002-1585-4346, The University of Melbourne, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume60
Issue3
Pages751-772
Publication date2025-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueGovernment and Opposition (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0017-257X • E-ISSN: 1477-7053
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/gov.2024.31
OpenAlexW4406093929
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited49

The purchase of commercial spyware by at least 43 authoritarian states has drawn attention to the links between the international private technology trade and autocrats. This article sits at the intersection of the literatures on the international relations of authoritarian regimes, digital authoritarianism and the political economy of authoritarianism, asking, what impacts, if any, do the foreign technology trade relations of authoritarian regimes have on authoritarian resilience? Building a four-mechanism model to explain the interaction between the private technology trade and digital authoritarianism, the article then tests the model on a case study of Iran. It argues that while global technology companies lack the ideological or geopolitical interests that drive the engagement between authoritarian regimes and foreign states, an intense overlap in interests still exists between profit-hungry private technology companies and technology-hungry regimes. This facilitates the establishment of mutually beneficial relationships that contribute to authoritarian resilience and survival, however inadvertently

Authoritarianism · Democracy · Economic system · Economics · Geopolitics · Ideology · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Resilience (materials science · Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance · Law · Political Conflict and Governance · Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence

  • Technopolitical Energy Governance as Administrative Closure

    Open Access•Arash Beidollahkhani•Public Administration and…•2026

  • The political economy of authoritarian AI policy assemblages in the Global South

    Open Access•Arash Beidollahkhani•New Political Economy•2026

  • Dancing in-between

    Open Access•Rana Dadpour, Hosna J Shewly•Third World Quarterly•2025

  • The political economy of digital authoritarianism

    Open Access•Dara Conduit•Democratization•2025

  • The Political Economy of Dictatorship

    Open Access•Ronald Wintrobe•Political Economy of Dictatorship•1998

  • The Rise of Digital Repression

    Steven Feldstein•Rise of Digital Repression•2021

  • Service Delivery and Legitimacy in Fragile and Conflict-Affected States

    Derick W Brinkerhoff, Anna Wetterberg et al.•Public Management Review•2012

  • Aid and authoritarianism in Africa

    Tobias Hagmann, Filip Reyntjens•Aid and authoritarianism in Africa•2016

  • Debunking the myth of the “robust control regime”

    Open Access•Anna Stavrianakis•Global Policy•2023

  • Competitive Authoritarianism

    Open Access•Steven Levitsky, Lucan A Way•Competitive Authoritarianism…•2001

  • Positive and Negative Diaspora Governance in Context

    B Baser, Ahmet Erdi Öztürk•Middle East Critique•2020

  • The digital blender

    Koray Saglam•Globalizations•2022

  • Sponsoring student mobility for development and authoritarian stability

    Open Access•Adele Del Sordi•Globalizations•2017

  • The Patterns of Syrian Uprising

    Dara Conduit•British Journal of Middle Eastern…•2016

  • Securing Authoritarian Capitalism in the Digital Age

    Jingyang Huang, Kellee S Tsai•The China Journal•2022

  • How Market Dynamics of Domestic and Foreign Social Media Firms Shape Strategies of Internet Censorship

    Jennifer Pan•Problems of Post-Communism•2016

  • Capitalist development, regime transitions and new forms of authoritarianism in Asia

    Gary Rodan, Kanishka Jayasuriya•The Pacific Review•2009

  • The electronic face of authoritarianism

    Open Access•Seraphine F Maerz•Government Information Quarterly•2016

  • How propagames work as a part of digital authoritarianism

    Open Access•Matthew Ming-Tak Chew, Wang Yi et al.•Media Culture & Society•2021

  • The Case for Selecting Cases That Are Deviant or Extreme on the Independent Variable

    Open Access•Jason Seawright•Sociological Methods & Research•2016

  • China’s 5G networks

    Open Access•Michael V Ceci, Lawrence Rubin•Orbis•2022

  • Economic Liberalism in Illiberal Regimes

    Open Access•Charles Hankla, Charles R Hankla et al.•International Studies Quarterly•2013

  • Authoritarian Responses to Foreign Pressure

    Open Access•Abel Escribà-Folch, Abel Escribà‐folch•Comparative Political Studies•2011

  • Investing in Violence

    Andrey Tomashevskiy•The Journal of Politics•2017

  • Authoritarian Neoliberalism and Democratic Backsliding in Turkey

    Cemal Burak Tansel•South European Society & Politics•2018

  • Liberation Technology

    Open Access•Evgeny Morozov•Journal of democracy•2011

  • Stabilizing Authoritarian Rule

    Open Access•Christina Cottiero, Stephan Haggard•International Studies Quarterly•2023

  • Digital Authoritarianism and the Future of Human Rights

    Open Access•Tiberiu Dragu, Yonatan Lupu•International Organization•2021

  • How Authoritarianism Transforms

    Open Access•Oliver Schlumberger, Mirjam Edel et al.•Government and Opposition•2024

  • Black knights and elections in authoritarian regimes

    Open Access•Jakob Tolstrup•European Journal of Political…•2015

  • The dark side of regionalism

    Open Access•Maria Josepha Debre•Democratization•2021

  • The menu of autocratic innovation

    Lee Morgenbesser•Democratization•2020

  • Repression Technology

    Open Access•Anita R Gohdes, Anita Gohdes•American Journal of Political…•2020

  • The Soft Authoritarian Tool Kit

    Edward Schatz•Comparative Politics•2009

  • Enabling autocracy? Peacebuilding and post-conflict authoritarianism in the Democratic Republic of Congo

    Open Access•Sarah Von Billerbeck, Oisín Tansey•European Journal of International…•2019

  • Social services to claim legitimacy

    Andrea Cassani•Contemporary Politics•2017

  • Electoral theocracy and hybrid sovereignty in Iran

    Naser Ghobadzadeh, Lily Zubaidah Rahim•Contemporary Politics•2016

  • The three pillars of stability

    Johannes Gerschewski•Democratization•2013

  • A dictator's toolkit

    Open Access•Elizabeth Frantz, Erica Frantz et al.•Journal of Peace Research•2014

  • Why Does China Allow Freer Social Media? Protests versus Surveillance and Propaganda

    Open Access•Bei Qin, David Stromberg et al.•The Journal of Economic…•2017

  • Informational Autocrats

    Open Access•Sergei Guriev, Daniel Treisman•The Journal of Economic…•2019

  • Digital Authoritarianism

    Open Access•Syaza Shukri•Religions•2023

  • Reflections on the Patterns of Change in the Bureaucratic-Authoritarian State

    Open Access•Guillermo O''Donnell, Guillermo O’donnell et al.•Latin American Research Review•1978

Unique citing works4
Citations per year4
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae