Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Aquinas on the Socratic Paradox and the Problem of Virtue

Bibliographic Data

ID6267859
AuthorsMatthew K Reising (0000-0002-6028-969X, Baylor University, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume45
Issue3
Pages425-447
Publication date2024-08-31
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueHistory of Political Thought (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0143-781X
PublisherImprint Academic (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.53765/20512988.45.3.425
OpenAlexW4402285472
LanguageEN

In Natural Reason and Natural Law, James Carey states that, for Aquinas, the good is pursued necessarily as according to the first principle of practical reason, but then makes the stunning admission that humans really seem to almost always pursue 'the best'. Such an admission opens Thomistic natural law to an attack from the Socratic paradox that all evil stems from ignorance, a philosophical premise that implicitly undermines all moral responsibility. While Carey and others consider Aquinas' position as ultimately defensible, they nowhere consider its Socratic articulation. This paper therefore offers a new analysis of Aquinas' rejection of Socrates' paradox

Epistemology · Sociology · Socratic method · Virtue · Classical Philosophy and Thought · Medieval and Classical Philosophy · Medieval Philosophy and Theology · Philosophy

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae