Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Discounting the free ride

Alliances and Security in the Postwar World

Bibliographic Data

ID6270602
AuthorsAvery Goldstein (corresponding author)
Year1995
Volume49
Issue1
Pages39-71
Publication date1995-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Organization (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0020-8183 • E-ISSN: 1531-5088
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0020818300001570
OpenAlexW2111303564
LanguageEN
Citations received22
References cited59

The collective goods theory of alliances and neorealist theory yield conflicting expectations about the security policies of states. The former emphasizes the temptation to “ride free” on the efforts of others, while the latter emphasizes the incentives for self-help. In the cases of Britain, China, and France during the early cold war, the constraints identified by neorealist theory, reinforced by the advent of nuclear weapons, prevailed. Each discounted the value of the security benefits superpower partners could provide. The second-ranking powers' decisions to shoulder the burden of developing independent nuclear forces are at odds with collective goods arguments that portray especially strong temptations to ride free in the circumstances that prevailed at that time—an international system dominated by two superpowers, each possessing large nuclear deterrent arsenals that could easily be employed on behalf of allies. This analysis suggests that present efforts to discourage additional states from acquiring nuclear weapons by offering them international security guarantees are unlikely to succeed

Arms control · China · Collective security · Economics · Incentive · International relations · International trade · Law and economics · Microeconomics · National security · Nuclear weapon · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Superpower · Temptation · Defense, Military, and Policy Studies · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Nuclear Issues and Defense

  • Theories of Nuclear Proliferation

    Jacques E C Hymans•The Nonproliferation Review•2006

  • Voting in the UN General Assembly

    Open Access•Max Ratnikov•Journal of International and…•2018

  • Reassessing the public goods theory of alliances

    Open Access•Joshua Alley•Research & Politics•2021

  • Dansk-amerikanske relationer under Trump og Biden 2017–2025

    Open Access•Mikkel Runge Olesen•Internasjonal politikk•2025

  • Saudi Arabia and UAE in the Horn of Africa

    Shady Ahmed Mansour, Shady Mansour et al.•Contemporary Arab Affairs•2019

  • Public Contestation and Policy Resistance

    Open Access•Jenne Massie•Foreign Policy Analysis•2014

  • EU Member State Support to Ukraine

    Open Access•Tim Haesebrouck•Foreign Policy Analysis•2024

  • Influence through Absence in U.S. Counterinsurgency Interventions? Coercing Local Allies through Threats to Withdraw

    Barbara Elias, Alex Weisiger•Civil Wars•2020

  • Nato Burden-Sharing Redux

    Jens Ringsmose•Arms Control•2010

  • The lure of regional security arrangements

    Galia Press‐barnathan•Security Studies•2000

  • Riding the tide

    Yaechan Lee•The Pacific Review•2021

  • Great Expectations

    Avery Goldstein•International Security•1998

  • Atuação da Otan no pós-Guerra Fria

    Open Access•Juliana Bertazzo•Contexto Internacional•2010

  • The likelihood of local allies free-riding

    Open Access•Barbara Elias•Cooperation and Conflict•2017

  • The U.S.- South Korea Alliance

    Jong-Sup Lee, Uk Heo•Asian Survey•2001

  • A Decision Theoretic Model of Public Opinion

    Open Access•Clifford J Carrubba, Anand Singh•American Journal of Political…•2004

  • Credible Nuclear Security Commitments Can Backfire

    Open Access•Lauren Sukin•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2020

  • Abandonment, Entrapment, and Neoclassical Realism in Asia

    Victor D Cha, David G Victor•International Studies Quarterly•2000

  • Exiting the Coalition

    Alex Weisiger•International Studies Quarterly•2016

  • Explaining Wars of Choice

    Open Access•David P Auerswald•International Studies Quarterly•2004

  • Gulliver Untied

    Open Access•Joanne Gowa, Kristopher W Ramsay et al.•International Organization•2017

  • When Do Leaders Free‐Ride? Business Experience and Contributions to Collective Defense

    Open Access•Matthew Fuhrmann•American Journal of Political…•2020

  • The illogic of American nuclear strategy

    Robert Jervis•The illogic of American nuclear…•1984

  • Nuclear blackmail and nuclear balance

    Richard K Betts•Nuclear blackmail and nuclear…•1987

  • Sino-Soviet Conflict, 1956-1961

    Donald S Zagoria•Sino-Soviet Conflict, 1956-1961•1962

  • Impurity of Defense

    Open Access•Tod Sandler, Todd Sandler•Kyklos•1977

  • Burden Sharing, Strategy, and the Design of Nato

    Open Access•Tod Sandler, Todd Sandler et al.•Economic Inquiry•1980

  • From Lin Biao to Deng Xiaoping

    Open Access•Robert S Ro, ROBERT S ROSS•The China Quarterly•1989

  • Deterrence and Defense

    Glenn Herald Snyder•Deterrence and Defense•1961

  • Politics Among Nations

    Ramon Pacheco Pardo•Politics Among Nations•2017

  • Power and Insecurity

    Harvey W Nelsen•Power and Insecurity•1989

  • The Logic of Collective Action

    Mancur Olson•Logic of Collective Action•1965

  • The War Ledger

    A F K Organski, Jacek Kugler•War Ledger•1980

  • Sharing the Defense Burden Among Western Allies

    Jacques van Ypersele de Strihou•The Review of Economics and…•1967

  • An Economic Theory of Alliances

    Mancur Olson, Richard Zeckhauser•The Review of Economics and…•1966

  • The Washington Declaration and the "Poor Relation"

    James L Gormly•Diplomatic History•1984

  • China's Ballistic Missile Programs

    John Wilson Lewis, Hua Di•International Security•1992

  • The Case for Finite Containment

    Stephen M Walt•International Security•1989

  • Nuclear Coercion and the Ending of the Korean Conflict

    Rosemary Foot, Rosemary J Foot•International Security•1988

  • French Defense Planning-The Future in the Past

    Pierre M Gallois, Pierre Gallois•International Security•1976

  • Atomic Diplomacy during the Korean War

    Roger Dingman•International Security•1988

  • "A "Wasting Asset

    Marc Trachtenberg•International Security•1988

  • Threats, Assurances, and the Last Chance for Peace

    Thomas J Christensen•International Security•1992

  • Robust and affordable security

    Avery Goldstein•Journal of Strategic Studies•1992

  • The British and French nuclear forces

    François Heisbourg•Survival•1989

  • Eisenhower, Dulles, and Dienbienphu

    George C Herring, Richard H Immerman•Journal of American History•1984

  • The British nuclear deterrent

    Roger Carey•International Affairs•1985

  • The Covert French Connection

    Richard H Ullman•Foreign Policy•1989

  • China and the Major Powers in East Asia

    Donald S Zagoria, A Doak Barnett•Foreign Affairs•1978

  • War and Peace

    Donald S Zagoria, Banning N Garrett et al.•Foreign Affairs•1985

  • Strategic Nuclear Targeting

    Andrew J Pierre, Desmond Ball et al.•Foreign Affairs•1986

  • British Defense Policy

    John Slessor•Foreign Affairs•1957

  • China's Evolving Strategic Doctrine

    Robert S Wang•Asian Survey•1984

  • People's War under Modern Conidtions

    Open Access•Harlan W Jencks•The China Quarterly•1984

  • Nato Burden Sharing and the Forces of Change

    John R Oneal, Mark A Elrod•International Studies Quarterly•1989

  • Theory of international politics

    Kenneth Neal Waltz•Theory of international politics•1979

  • The Security Dilemma in Alliance Politics

    Open Access•Glenn H Snyder•World Politics•1984

  • The Strategic Triangle

    Open Access•Lowell Dittmer•World Politics•1981

  • Rational Deterrence in an Imperfect World

    Open Access•Barry Nalebuff•World Politics•1991

  • A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of Nato

    Open Access•James C Murdoch, James Murdoch et al.•Journal of Conflict Resolution•1982

  • Alliances and Collective Goods

    Open Access•Wallace J Thies•Journal of Conflict Resolution•1987

  • On the Economic Theory of Alliances

    Open Access•Tod Sandler, Jon Cauley•Journal of Conflict Resolution•1975

  • Commitment, Threat Perceptions, and Expenditures in a Defense Alliance

    William R Gates, Katsuaki L Terasawa et al.•International Studies Quarterly•1992

  • The theory of collective action and burden sharing in Nato

    Open Access•John R Oneal•International Organization•1990

  • Chain gangs and passed bucks

    Open Access•Thomas J Christensen, Jack Snyder•International Organization•1990

  • Alliances and Asymmetry

    James D Morrow•American Journal of Political…•1991

  • Understanding Nuclear Proliferation

    Avery Goldstein•Security Studies•1993

  • Politics Among Nations

    Peter Berger•Thought•1950

  • Nuclear blackmail and nuclear balance

    Ritchie Ovendale•International Affairs•1987

  • China's Strategic Posture and the Great-Power Triangle

    Gerald Segal•Pacific Affairs•1980

  • China's Quest for Independence. Policy Evolution in the 1970s

    Victor C Falkenheim, Thomas Fingar•Pacific Affairs•1981

Unique citing works22
Citations per year0,79
Citation span1998 - 2025 (28)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 22

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae