The International Court of Justice
Its Role in Contemporary International Relations
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6270760 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Max Sorensen (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1960 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 261-276 |
| Publication date | 1960-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Organization (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0020-8183 • E-ISSN: 1531-5088 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0020818300009577 |
| OpenAlex | W2132664687 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 8 |
In his concluding volume in the Carnegie Endowment's series of National Studies on International Organization, Professor Maclver observes that the International Court of Justice, as set up in 1945, was not so much a new institution as a new promise. It was closely modelled on its predecessor, the Permanent Court of International Justice, and Article 92 of the UN Charter expressly recognized the continuity with the past in affirming that the Statute of the new Court was based upon chat of the old one. The promise lay in the fact that the new Court was declared to be “the principal judicial organ of the United Nations” and thus called upon to play a more significant role than the old Court, which had never been an organic part of the League of Nations structure. Professor Maclver concludes, however, that the promise remains in important respects unfulfilled
Charter · Economic Justice · Endowment · Institution · International court · International law · Political science · Principal (computer security · Public international law · Sociology · Statute · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Law and Human Rights · Law
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,02 |
| Citation span | 1966 - 1966 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |