The Domestic Impact of International Standards

Bibliographic Data

ID6273081
AuthorsRebecca L Perlman (Princeton University), Rebecca Perlman (0000-0002-0176-3988, Princeton University, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume64
Issue3
Pages600-608
Publication date2020-09-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Studies Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0020-8833 • E-ISSN: 1468-2478
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/isq/sqaa025
OpenAlexW3025641217
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited24

Regulation is no longer purely a domestic affair. International standards now exist across a broad range of regulatory arenas, touching on issues that may be central to domestic values, such as the regulation of health, safety, and the environment. Although a number of studies have looked at the domestic impact of globalization more generally, few scholars have evaluated the effects of international standards, specifically. This paper investigates that issue, with an empirical focus on agrochemicals. Using original data on changes to US agrochemical regulations between 1996 and 2015, I evaluate whether and how domestic rules have changed in response to international standards. Contrary to common fears, I find little evidence that international standards primarily act as a ceiling, thereby undermining domestic regulations. Instead, international standards seem to serve as focal points, pulling nations toward leniency as well as toward stringency. These findings not only contribute to the broader literature on the domestic effects of globalization, but they also allay concerns that international standards could act as a regulatory cap, encouraging nations to sacrifice caution for economic gain

Agrochemical · Economics · Geography · Globalization · International trade · Political science · Public economics · Global trade, sustainability, and social impact · Law · Regulation and Compliance Studies · World Trade Organization Law

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access