Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

A Preference for War

How Fairness and Rhetoric Influence Leadership Incentives in Crises

Dados Bibliográficos

ID6274331
AutoresMatthew S Gottfried (United States Department of State), Robert F Trager, Robert Trager (0000-0002-6201-2811, University of California, Los Angeles)
Ano2016
Volume60
Fascículo2
Páginas243-257
Data de publicação2016-06-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoInternational Studies Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0020-8833 • E-ISSN: 1468-2478
EditoraOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/isq/sqv025
OpenAlexW2318361986
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas30
Referências citadas108

We conduct a survey experiment to examine the effects of international compromise, war, and foreign government rhetoric on presidential approval. We find that, in certain conflicts, popular approval tracks fairness heuristics—leaders seeking to maximize voter approval prefer equitable divisions of disputed goods and are risk acceptant for divisions below this threshold. Moreover, aggressive rhetoric by a foreign leader increases domestic leaders’ expected approval from war, decreases the value of compromise, and provides them with powerful incentives to fight harder. Thus, leaders motivated by popular approval have preferences that are inconsistent with the non-satiated, risk-averse preferences defined over shares of an objective good—that is, with those that much of the rationalist literature on conflict assumes. Fairness heuristics and the rhetorical framing of disputes during the conflict process may be at least as important as material factors in understanding why some disputes result in war

Compromise · Economics · Framing (construction · Government (linguistics · Heuristics · Incentive · Law and economics · Microeconomics · Persuasion · Political science · Positive economics · Preference · Presidential system · Public relations · Rhetoric · Rhetorical question · Culture, Economy, and Development Studies · Economic Policies and Impacts · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Law · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Statements of Resolve

    Open Access•Roseanne W Mcmanus•Statements of Resolve•2017

  • Brexit identities and British public opinion on China

    Open Access•Wilfred M Chow, Enze Han et al.•International Affairs•2019

  • The Meddling American Voter? How Norms, Interests, and Great Power Rivalries Affect U.S. Public Support for Partisan Electoral Interventions Abroad

    Open Access•Dov H Levin, Paul Musgrave•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2023

  • The Limits of Institutions and the Reliance on Heuristics during the Covid-19 Pandemic

    Open Access•Christopher A Hartwell•Journal of Applied Social Science•2022

  • Gender, Events, and Elite Messages in Mass Opinion on Foreign Relations

    Open Access•Joonbum Bae, Yujung Julia Lee•Journal of Global Security Studies•2019

  • Aims, claims, and the bargaining model of war

    Open Access•Kenneth A Schultz, H E Goemans•International Theory•2019

  • Limits of engagement? The sunshine policy, nuclear tests, and South Korean views of North Korea 1995–2013

    Open Access•Joonbum Bae•International Relations of the…•2019

  • When Fairness is Unfair

    Open Access•Vinh Pham, Linjia Jiang et al.•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2025

  • Moral Hazard

    Open Access•Brian C Rathbun, Kathleen E Powers et al.•Political Psychology•2019

  • Concessions for Concession’s Sake

    Open Access•Philippe Assouline, Robert Trager•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2021

  • When Do Imposed Sanctions Work? The Role of Target Regime Type

    Open Access•Omer Zarpli•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2023

  • What’s Fair in International Politics? Equity, Equality, and Foreign Policy Attitudes

    Open Access•Kathleen E Powers, Joshua D Kertzer et al.•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2022

  • Signaling under the Security Dilemma

    Open Access•Brandon K Yoder, Kyle Haynes•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2021

  • Coercion and Provocation

    Open Access•Allan Dafoe, Sophia Hatz et al.•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2021

  • Provocation, Bargaining, and War

    Open Access•Hyun-Binn Cho, Kyle Haynes et al.•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2024

  • Foreign Policy as Pork-barrel Spending

    Open Access•Tobias Heinrich, Timothy M Peterson•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2020

  • Provocation, Public Opinion, and International Disputes

    Open Access•Allan Dafoe, Samuel Liu et al.•International Studies Quarterly•2022

  • No Fair! Distinguishing Between the Pursuit of Status and Equity in International Relations

    Open Access•Brian C Rathbun, Brian Rathbun et al.•International Studies Quarterly•2022

  • Not So Dangerous? Nationalism and Foreign Policy Preference

    Open Access•J Ko•International Studies Quarterly•2022

  • Reacting to the Olive Branch

    Open Access•Michaela Mattes, Jessica L P Weeks•International Organization•2022

  • Fair Share? Equality and Equity in American Attitudes Toward Trade

    Open Access•Ryan Brutger, Brian C Rathbun•International Organization•2021

  • The Suffragist Peace

    Open Access•Joslyn N Barnhart, Robert Trager et al.•International Organization•2020

  • A Dispositional Theory of Reputation Costs

    Open Access•Ryan Brutger, Joshua D Kertzer•International Organization•2018

  • Resources and Territorial Claims

    Open Access•Soyoung Lee•International Organization•2024

  • The influence of foreign elite rhetoric

    Open Access•Alessandro Del Ponte•European Union Politics•2021

  • How Political Psychologists Think

    Joshua D Kertzer•Critical Review•2024

  • The Diplomacy of War and Peace

    Robert F Trager, Robert Trager•Annual Review of Political Science•2016

  • Hawks, Doves, and Peace

    Open Access•Michaela Mattes, Jessica L P Weeks•American Journal of Political…•2019

  • Anger and Political Conflict Dynamics

    Open Access•Keith E Schnakenberg, Carly N Wayne•American Political Science Review•2024

  • Domestic Distributional Roots of National Interest

    Open Access•Soyoung Lee•American Political Science Review•2024

  • The R Book

    Open Access•Michael J Crawley•R Book•2007

  • The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion

    Open Access•John R Zaller, John Zaller•Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion•1992

  • In Time of War

    Adam J Berinsky•In Time of War•2009

  • Paying the Human Costs of War

    Christopher Gelpi, Peter D Feaver et al.•Paying the Human Costs of War•2009

  • A Constructed Peace

    Marc Trachtenberg•Constructed Peace•1999

  • Democracy and Coercive Diplomacy

    Open Access•Kenneth A Schultz•Democracy and Coercive Diplomacy•2001

  • Cultural Differences in Ultimatum Game Experiments

    Open Access•Hessel Oosterbeek, Randolph Sloof et al.•Experimental Economics•2004

  • Theorizing States’ Emotions1

    Open Access•Brent E Sasley•International Studies Review•2011

  • Fairness and the Assumptions of Economics

    Daniel Kahneman, Jack L Knetsch et al.•The Journal of Business•1986

  • Monkeys reject unequal pay

    Open Access•Sarah F Brosnan, Frans Β Μ De Waal et al.•Nature•2003

  • Estimating regression models with unknown break‐points

    Open Access•Vito M R Muggeo•Statistics in Medicine•2003

  • Thinking through uncertainty

    Open Access•Eldar Shafir, Amos Tversky•Cognitive Psychology•1992

  • An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining

    Open Access•Werner Güth, Rolf Schmittberger et al.•Journal of Economic Behavior &…•1982

  • The weirdest people in the world?

    Open Access•J Henrich, Steven J Heine et al.•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•2010

  • An economic theory of democracy

    Anthony Downs•An economic theory of democracy•1985

  • Leaders and International Conflict

    Open Access•Giacomo Chiozza, H E Goemans•Leaders and International Conflict•2011

  • Escalation and Negotiation in International Conflicts

    Open Access•Guy Faure, I William Zartman et al.•Escalation and Negotiation in…•2005

  • Origins of Containment

    Deborah Welch Larson•Origins of Containment•1985

  • The Logic of Political Survival

    Bruce Bueno De Mesquita, Alastair Smith et al.•The logic of political survival•2003

  • Empirical Models of Arbitrator Behavior under Conventional Arbitration

    David E Bloom•The Review of Economics and…•1986

  • Beyond Homo economicus

    Open Access•Herbert Gintis•Ecological Economics•2000

  • How the scope of a demand conveys resolve

    Open Access•Robert Trager•International Theory•2013

  • The role of hostile communications in a crisis simulation game

    Rose Mcdermott, Jonathan A Cowden et al.•Peace and Conflict Journal of…•2008

  • Long-Term Consequences of Aggressive Diplomacy

    Robert F Trager, Robert Trager•Security Studies•2012

  • Procedural Justice in Negotiation

    Open Access•Rebecca Hollander-Blumoff, T R Tyler•Law & Social Inquiry•2008

  • Distributive justice and the durability of peace agreements

    Open Access•Daniel Druckman, Cecilia Albin•Review of International Studies•2011

  • When Right Makes Might

    Stacie E Goddard•International Security•2009

  • The Deception Dividend

    John M Schuessler•International Security•2010

  • What Are We Talking about When We Talk about No-Voice Procedures? On the Psychology of the Fair Outcome Effect

    Open Access•Kees Van Den Bos•Journal of Experimental Social…•1999

  • Assessing the President

    Richard A Brody•Assessing the President•1991

  • War Stories

    Matthew A Baum, Tim Groeling et al.•War Stories•2009

  • Rational Deterrence

    Open Access•Robert Jervis•World Politics•1989

  • A Comparison of Hostile Behavior of Decision-Makers in Simulate and Historical Data

    Open Access•Dina A Zinnes•World Politics•1966

  • Rational Deterrence Theory

    Open Access•Richard Ned Lebow, Janice Gross Stein•World Politics•1989

  • On the Evolutionary Origin of Prospect Theory Preferences

    Rose Mcdermott, J H Fowler et al.•The Journal of Politics•2008

  • Making Sense of Isolationism

    Joshua D Kertzer•The Journal of Politics•2013

  • When Backing Down Is the Right Decision

    Matthew S Levendusky, Matthew Levendusky et al.•The Journal of Politics•2012

  • Diplomatic Signaling among Multiple States

    Robert F Trager, Robert Trager•The Journal of Politics•2015

  • Drafting Support for War

    Michael C Horowitz, Matthew S Levendusky et al.•The Journal of Politics•2011

  • Framing, Uncertainty, and Hostile Communications in a Crisis Experiment

    Open Access•Rose Mcdermott, Jonathan Cowden et al.•Political Psychology•2002

  • The Implications of Prospect Theory for Human Nature and Values

    Open Access•Robert Jervis•Political Psychology•2004

  • Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research

    Open Access•Adam J Berinsky, Gregory A Huber et al.•Political Analysis•2012

  • Revealing Preferences

    Open Access•Jamie B Lewis, Jeffrey B Lewis et al.•Political Analysis•2003

  • Going Private

    Open Access•Matthew A Baum•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2004

  • The Influence of Domestic and International Politics on the President's Use of Force

    Open Access•Patrick James, John R Oneal•Journal of Conflict Resolution•1991

  • Leader Age, Regime Type, and Violent International Relations

    Open Access•Michael Horowitz, Michael C Horowitz et al.•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2005

  • Transforming Competitive or Cooperative Climates

    Open Access•Svenn Lindskold, Brian Betz et al.•Journal of Conflict Resolution•1986

  • Equality Matters

    Open Access•Cecilia Albin, Daniel Druckman•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2012

  • Prospect Theory, Rational Choice, and International Relations

    Jack S Levy•International Studies Quarterly•1997

  • The Personal Touch

    Open Access•Todd Hall, Todd H Hall et al.•International Studies Quarterly•2012

  • Risk Aversion in International Relations Theory

    Barry O''Neill, Barry O’neill et al.•International Studies Quarterly•2001

  • The Pretty Prudent Public

    Bruce W Jentleson•International Studies Quarterly•1992

  • The Constituent Foundations of the Rally-Round-the-Flag Phenomenon

    Matthew A Baum•International Studies Quarterly•2002

  • Multidimensional Diplomacy

    Open Access•Robert F Trager, Robert Trager•International Organization•2011

  • Anarchy in international relations theory

    Open Access•Robert Powell•International Organization•1994

  • Uncommon Ground

    Stacie E Goddard•International Organization•2006

  • Rationalist explanations for war

    Open Access•James D Fearon•International Organization•1995

  • Anarchy is what states make of it

    Open Access•Alexander Wendt•International Organization•1992

  • The Politics of Risking Peace

    Kenneth A Schultz•International Organization•2005

  • War as a Commitment Problem

    Robert Powell•International Organization•2006

  • Let's Argue

    Open Access•Thomas Risse•International Organization•2000

  • The Illusion of Democratic Credibility

    Open Access•Alexander B Downes, Todd S Sechser•International Organization•2012

  • Taking Preferences Seriously

    Open Access•Andrew Moravcsik, Andrew M Moravcsik•International Organization•1997

  • International Conflict and the Tenure of Leaders

    Open Access•Giacomo Chiozza, H E Goemans•American Journal of Political…•2004

  • Strategic Misspecification in Regression Models

    Open Access•Curtis S Signorino, Kuzey Yilmaz et al.•American Journal of Political…•2003

  • The Political Costs of Crisis Bargaining

    Open Access•Robert F Trager, Robert Trager et al.•American Journal of Political…•2011

  • How do I judge my outcome when I do not know the outcome of others? The psychology of the fair process effect

    Kees Van Den Bos, A Lind et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1997

  • Retaliation as a means of restoring equity

    Ellen Berscheid, David Boye et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1968

  • Status Competition and Territorial Aggression

    Joslyn Barnhart, Joslyn N Barnhart•Security Studies•2016

  • Democracy, Deception, and Entry into War

    Dan Reiter•Security Studies•2012

  • Audience Costs

    Marc Trachtenberg•Security Studies•2012

  • Twisting Tongues and Twisting Arms

    Open Access•Ronald R Krebs, Patrick Thaddeus Jackson•European Journal of International…•2007

  • Consensus-seeking, distrust and rhetorical entrapment

    Open Access•Jean-Frédéric Morin, Edward Richard Gold•European Journal of International…•2010

  • The Fair Wage-Effort Hypothesis and Unemployment

    George A Akerlof, Janet L Yellen•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•1990

  • Domestic Audience Costs in International Relations

    Michael Tomz•International Organization•2007

  • Prenegotiation Public Commitment in Domestic and International Bargaining

    Open Access•Bahar Levenotoğlu, Ahmer Tarar•American Political Science Review•2005

  • Fairness Considerations in World Politics

    Open Access•Ethan B Kapstein•Political Science Quarterly•2008

  • Progress in Behavioral Game Theory

    Open Access•Colin F Camerer•The Journal of Economic…•1997

  • Anomalies

    Open Access•Robyn M Dawes, Richard H Thaler•The Journal of Economic…•1988

  • Anomalies

    Open Access•Richard H Thaler•The Journal of Economic…•1988

  • Towards an understanding of inequity

    J Stacy Adams•Journal of Abnormal & Social…•1963

  • Efficient Secrecy

    Open Access•Shuhei Kurizaki•American Political Science Review•2007

  • Strategic Interaction and the Statistical Analysis of International Conflict

    Open Access•Curtis S Signorino•American Political Science Review•1999

  • The Multiple Effects of Casualties on Public Support for War

    Open Access•Scott Sigmund Gartner•American Political Science Review•2008

  • Foreign Affairs and Issue Voting

    Open Access•John H Aldrich, John L Sullivan et al.•American Political Science Review•1989

  • Ideas & Foreign Policy

    Francis Fukuyama, Judith Goldstein et al.•Foreign Affairs•1994

  • The President and the Political Use of Force

    Open Access•Charles W Ostrom, Brian L Job•American Political Science Review•1986

  • The Politics of Presidential Speechmaking, 1949-1980

    Open Access•Lyn Ragsdale•American Political Science Review•1984

  • Presidential Influence in the House

    Open Access•George C Edwards•American Political Science Review•1976

  • Diplomatic Calculus in Anarchy

    Open Access•Robert F Trager, Robert Trager•American Political Science Review•2010

  • Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes

    Open Access•James D Fearon•American Political Science Review•1994

  • Reading Habermas in Anarchy

    Open Access•Jennifer Mitzen•American Political Science Review•2005

  • When Do Fair Beliefs Influence Bargaining Behavior? Experimental Bargaining in Japan and the United States

    Nancy R Buchan, Rachel T A Croson et al.•Journal of Consumer Research•2004

Obras citantes distintas30
Citações por ano3
Intervalo de citações2016 - 2025 (10)
Velocidade de citaçãorecent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 30
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae