Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

International Cooperation among Relative Gains Maximizers

Bibliographic Data

ID6274752
AuthorsDuncan Snidal (0000-0003-2098-7634, University of Chicago, corresponding author)
Year1991
Volume35
Issue4
Pages387
Publication date1991-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Studies Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0020-8833 • E-ISSN: 1468-2478
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/2600947
OpenAlexW4233656160
LanguageEN
Citations received43

Relative gains do not inhibit cooperation to nearly the extent suggested by realist theorists of international relations. The relative gains argument posits that international cooperation is limited because states worry about how well they do relative to each other rather than how well they do themselves. I examine this proposition by developing an iterated Prisoners' Dilemma model where states are exclusively relative gains maximizers. This creates a zero-sum situation and completely eliminates decentralized cooperation in the two-actor case. By contrast, the large n case is also zero-sum but relative gains have no impact on cooperation. In general, as the number of states increases, relative gains become increasingly irrelevant to the prospects for cooperation. An examination of the transition problem from anarchy to cooperation shows that initiating cooperation is also no more difficult under relative than absolute gains. Finally, relative gains are shown to be inconsistent with tight bipolarity. Thus realist theorists will have to look elsewhere to ground their theory if they wish to demonstrate the improbability of international cooperation

Argument (complex analysis · Contrast (vision · Dilemma · Economics · Epistemology · International relations · Mathematical economics · Microeconomics · Political science · Positive economics · Proposition · Relative price · Worry · Zero (linguistics · Computer Science · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Development and Aid · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Psychology

  • “In-Group Love” and “Out-Group Hate” as Motives for Individual Participation in Intergroup Conflict

    Open Access•Nir Halevy, Gary Bornstein et al.•Psychological Science•2008

  • From Trade to Tensions

    Open Access•Weijie Luo, Siqi Qin et al.•World Economy•2026

  • International governance of advancing artificial intelligence

    Open Access•Nicholas Emery-Xu, Richard Jordan et al.•AI & Society•2025

  • The discourse of anarchy in IR

    Open Access•Jack Donnelly•International Theory•2015

  • Engaging the Estranged

    Open Access•Tae Hyun Kim•Journal of East Asian Studies•2003

  • How Regime Theory and the Economic Theory of International Environmental Cooperation Can Learn from Each Other

    E Neumayer•Global Environmental Politics•2001

  • The petroleum factor in Sino–Japanese relations

    Janet Xuanli Liao, Xuanli Liao•International Relations of the…•2006

  • Relative deprivation and intergroup competition

    Open Access•Nir Halevy, Eileen Y Chou et al.•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2010

  • The Political Feasibility of Consumption-Based Carbon Accounting

    Marco Grasso•New Political Economy•2015

  • Moments in time

    Open Access•Mark David Nieman•Conflict Management and Peace…•2015

  • Oil & war in Angola

    Open Access•Jedrzej George Frynas, G Wood•Review of African Political Economy•2001

  • Explaining the emergence of great power concerts

    Open Access•Benjamin Miller•Review of International Studies•1994

  • On Systemic Paradigms and Domestic Politics

    Kevin Narizny•International Security•2017

  • Trading with the Enemy

    Peter Liberman•International Security•1996

  • The Power of Cohesiveness

    Open Access•Jordi Mas•JCMS Journal of Common Market…•2020

  • The change of tide in political cooperation

    Open Access•Gerald Schneider, Lars-Erik Cederman•International Organization•1994

  • Perverse Institutionalism

    Open Access•Ronald R Krebs•International Organization•1999

  • What is Taiwan’s China policy? Unpacking a mystery

    Lisha Chen, Baohui Zhang•The Pacific Review•2024

  • Winners and losers of a Russian oil-export restriction

    Open Access•Johan Gars, Daniel Spiro et al.•Public Choice•2025

  • Less Filling, Tastes Great

    Open Access•Emerson M S Niou, Peter C Ordeshook•World Politics•1994

  • Realism, Neorealism, and American Liberalism

    Open Access•Keith I Shimko•The Review of Politics•1992

  • Behavioural Decision Theory and the Gains Debate in International Politics

    Open Access•Matthew Mulford, Jeffery Berejikian•Political Studies•2002

  • Impure Public Goods, Relative Gains, and International Cooperation

    Open Access•Matthew J Costello•Policy Studies Journal•1996

  • Conflict And Cooperation in International Relations

    Open Access•Stephen J Majeski, Shane Frick et al.•Journal of Conflict Resolution•1995

  • Nice Strategies in a World of Relative Gains

    Open Access•Marc L Busch, Marc Busch et al.•Journal of Conflict Resolution•1993

  • Relative Gains Concerns when the Number of States in the International System Increases

    Open Access•James S Mosher•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2003

  • L'Orizzonte Della Cooperazione. La Controversia Sui Vantaggi Relativi Nelle Relazioni Internazionali

    Open Access•Filippo Andreatta, Mathias Koenig-Archibugi•Italian Political Science…•2001

  • Coordination in Large Numbers

    Open Access•David C Earnest•International Studies Quarterly•2008

  • Patterns of International Cooperation and the Explanatory Power of Relative Gains

    Open Access•Frank Grundig•International Studies Quarterly•2006

  • Why “isms” Are Evil

    Open Access•David A Lake•International Studies Quarterly•2011

  • Relative Gains in the Shadow of a Trade War

    Open Access•Eddy S F Yeung, Kai Quek•International Organization•2022

  • Anarchy and identity

    Open Access•Jonathan Mercer•International Organization•1995

  • Multilateral Cooperation and Nuclear Nonproliferation

    Richard T Cupitt, William J Long•Security Studies•1993

  • Neorealism's status‐quo bias

    Randall L Schweller•Security Studies•1996

  • Sheep in Sheep's clothing

    Andrew H Kydd, Andrew Kydd•Security Studies•1997

  • North American Free Trade Negotiations

    Open Access•Maxwell A Cameron•European Journal of International…•1997

  • In Search of Security

    Open Access•Suzanne Werner•Journal of Peace Research•1997

  • Neoidealism and the Democratic Peace

    Open Access•Errol A Henderson•Journal of Peace Research•1999

  • Globalization and Peace

    Open Access•Katherine Barbieri, Gerald Schneider•Journal of Peace Research•1999

  • Balance of Power Revisited

    Open Access•Han Dorussen•Journal of Peace Research•1999

  • The Relative-Gains Problem for International Cooperation

    Open Access•Joseph M Grieco, Joseph Grieco et al.•American Political Science Review•1993

  • The Gains Debate

    Open Access•Jeffrey Berejekian•American Political Science Review•1997

  • Relative Gains and the Pattern of International Cooperation

    Open Access•Duncan Snidal•American Political Science Review•1991

Unique citing works43
Citations per year1,23
Citation span1991 - 2026 (36)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 43

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae