The government–parliament relationship in times of pandemic
The case of Italy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6275904 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Gianluca Piccolino (0000-0002-2877-7052, University of Florence), Elisabetta De Giorgi (0000-0002-6553-341X, University of Trieste, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Pages | 1-18 |
| Publication date | 2025-09-12 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0048-8402 • E-ISSN: 2057-4908 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/ipo.2025.10062 |
| OpenAlex | W4414262587 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 27 |
The relationship between parliaments and governments during the Covid-19 pandemic has been closely examined by various disciplines, which have typically analysed data on the laws and procedures enforced to manage the emergency. This literature generally agrees that the government dominated the management of the pandemic, often at the expense of parliamentary prerogatives. However, such data may not be sufficiently detailed to fully grasp some nuances. Above all, they may provide limited information on the factors that influenced the balance of powers between the two institutions. This article focuses on the Italian case. It complements data on legislation with the findings of semi-structured interviews conducted with members of parliament and government, as well as high-ranking bureaucrats, to gain a more in-depth understanding of these processes. The data on legislation suggest that governmental dominance was strong at every stage of the emergency, although parliament slightly regained some prerogatives over time. This recovery began under Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte, but it became more pronounced under Mario Draghi. The acquisition of knowledge about the pandemic was perceived by several interviewees as a factor that helped parliament regain some control, making it a possible outcome of a policy learning process. However, other factors also emerged as significant, such as the direct role of the prime ministers in strengthening the role of the executive and the difficulties of the technocratic members of the government in navigating parliamentary dynamics during Draghi’s tenure
European Union Policy and Governance · Policy Transfer and Learning · Social Policy and Reform Studies
Presidentialization, Italian Style
Covid-19, The Rule of Law and Democracy. Analysis of Legal Responses to a Global Health Crisis
The Technocratic Challenge to Democracy
Policy learning type shifts during creeping crises
The importance of being responsible
Policy learning and crisis policy-making
Coordination and Health Policy Responses to the First Wave of Covid-19 in Italy and Spain
Democracy in times of the pandemic
The lessons of learning
Policy Learning, Policy Diffusion, and the Making of a New Order
Backbenchers learn to fight back
Italy, the Sick Man of Europe
Crisis, learning and policy change in the European Union
Parliaments in times of crisis
A Portuguese Miracle
Fighting Covid-19 on Democratic Terms. Parliamentary Functioning in Italy and Denmark during the Pandemic
Should I Stay (Open) or Should I Close? World Legislatures during the First Wave of Covid-19
Policy Learning and Failure
Governments and parliaments in a state of emergency
On Democratic Backsliding
Condemned to complexity? Growing state activity and complex policy systems
Systematising Policy Learning
Pandemic backsliding
| Highly cited | No |
|---|