Global dominant party systems dataset (GDPS)
Data on executive dominance 1900–2024
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6276921 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Boris Lipovina (0000-0001-7518-6055, Corvinus University of Budapest, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 55 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 276-284 |
| Publication date | 2025-11-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0048-8402 • E-ISSN: 2057-4908 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/ipo.2025.10068 |
| OpenAlex | W4414086800 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 22 |
Despite a long tradition of research on dominant party systems (DPS), comparative analysis remains limited by conceptual ambiguities, regional and historical biases, and the absence of accessible data. This research note introduces the Global Dominant Party Systems (GDPS) Dataset, which includes 187 cases of executive dominance across 106 independent countries from 1900 to 2024, addressing the regional and historical biases that have traditionally plagued the literature. Drawing on foundational theories and refined concepts, the dataset differentiates between dominant parties and DPS and develops the minimal definition of DPS that focuses on executive arena and at least minimally contested elections. The dataset identifies cases with mechanical properties typical of DPS, that is those in which one party (or coalition) consistently monopolizes executive power and electoral competition fails to produce changes in government leadership. Despite setting permissive minimal criteria, the dataset also offers a broad range of variables on democracy, corruption and institutional features which can be used to set different criteria for case selection and conduct robustness checks. The dataset also includes variables on ethnic and opposition fragmentation, voter turnout, economy and population size, enabling researchers to investigate the institutional and socio-economic foundations of dominance across regime types and world regions. Finally, the proposed model of DPS evolution and change can serve as a useful guide for qualitative research on unpacking causal mechanisms. While limited to positive cases of dominance, the dataset offers new potential for cross-regional hypothesis testing and theory development on executive power, party system change, and democratic resilience
Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Political Conflict and Governance · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
Party systems and voter alignments
Parties and party systems
The awkward embrace
Introducing the Historical Index of Ethnic Fractionalization (Hief) Dataset
Uncommon Democracies
Why Dominant Parties Lose
Political Parties
How unstable? Volatility and the genuinely new parties in Eastern Europe
A Lexical Index of Electoral Democracy
Sartori Reconsidered
The Problem of Party System Change
A System Perspective on Party System Change
Counting parties and identifying dominant party systems in Africa
The emergence of dominant political party systems in unrecognized states
Demise and Resurrection of a Dominant Party
From Thaw to Deluge
Decline, Fall, and Resurrection of a Dominant-coalition System
| Highly cited | No |
|---|