The Return of the Repressed
The Colonial History of the EU's Geopolitical Turn
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6280158 |
|---|---|
| Authors | P Hansen (0000-0002-0497-473X, Institute for Research on Migration, Ethnicity and Society REMESO Linköping University Linköping, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 63 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 1420-1437 |
| Publication date | 2025-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0021-9886 • E-ISSN: 1468-5965 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/jcms.13757 |
| OpenAlex | W4410330494 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 13 |
| References cited | 15 |
This article examines the EU's current geopolitical turn: the push to have the EU embrace power politics and develop a ‘strategic autonomy’, both vis‐à‐vis global powers and its own ‘neighbourhood’. This turn is significant since it marks a shift away from what is said to be the post‐cold war EU's liberal approach to world affairs. By openly embracing ‘hard power’, Brussels is also severing the continuity between the present rhetoric and its founding narrative about the EU as an anti‐geopolitical peace project. In the first part, I argue that whilst the geopolitical turn has introduced a different rhetoric, this should not confuse analysts into believing that the post‐cold war EU was short of a geopolitical agenda. In the second part, I discuss the EU's current geopolitical turn in the context of the colonial policy it pursued in the 1950s, when large parts of colonial Africa were annexed to the European Economic Community (EEC). Here, I argue that the obliviousness that impedes the knowledge of the EU's colonial origins helps explain why the geopolitical turn today is seen as novel and poles apart from the EU's approach to geopolitics in the 1950s. What appears to be a break with the past, then, is in fact a reunion with the past, in the sense that the current EU leaders' open embrace of geopolitics follows in the footsteps of the EU founders. In the conclusion, I relate this to a theoretical discussion concerning the EU's quest for ‘strategic autonomy’, which, arguably, constitutes the most defining aspect of the geopolitical turn
Colonialism · Economics · Geopolitics · Nuclear magnetic resonance · Physics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Turn (biochemistry · European Union Policy and Governance · Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law
Neo-colonialism, violence, and the EU’s approach to peace operations in Africa
Geopolitics, (In)security and Resilience. A Feminist Critique of the EU's Engagement in Armenia After the Second Nagorno‐Karabakh War
Rethinking the EUropean project through Pan-Africanist Narratives
The Dehumanization of Palestinians by European Commission President von der Leyen
(Un)learning ‘Europe’ as Decolonial Practice
Continuity in times of geoeconomic change
Global Queer Agonism
Decentring European Foreign Policy Analysis
Europe and the Rest’ in Official EU Discourse
Towards Allyship in Diversity? Critical Perspectives on the European Union's Global Role
Why EU democratic theory needs a decolonial turn
(Un)learning ‘Europe’ as Decolonial Practice
Spatial Imaginaries and the Geopolitics of Trade
France Steadfast and Changing
Eurafrica
Navigating ontological (in)security in EU–Africa relations
Entente Neo-Coloniale
When elephants fight, it is the grass that suffers
The Common Market and its Colonial Heritage
Geostrategies, geopolitics and ontological security in the Eastern neighbourhood
A Decolonial Project for Europe
Normative Power Europe
Normative Empire Europe
Towards Allyship in Diversity? Critical Perspectives on the European Union's Global Role
Decolonization and the spectre of the nation-state
| Unique citing works | 13 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 13 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 13 |