The 1992 CAP Reform, the Uruguay Round and the Commission
Conceptualizing Linked Policy Games
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6282254 |
|---|---|
| Authors | William D Coleman (McMaster University), Stefan Tangermann (0000-0002-2309-7154, University of Göttingen) |
| Year | 1999 |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 385-405 |
| Publication date | 1999-09-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0021-9886 • E-ISSN: 1468-5965 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/1468-5965.00170 |
| OpenAlex | W2168191795 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 31 |
Over the past decade, most OECD countries have begun to reform fundamentally their agricultural policies. Some dispute has emerged over the extent to which policy‐making at the international level has triggered and shaped these reforms. These disputes raise important theoretical questions about how we theorize and test for the degree of interdependence between international, European Union (EU), and domestic policy change. The concept of autonomous, linked games is offered as a possible theoretical route to follow, a route that also permits more systematic consideration of two possible roles of international organizations in policy‐making: international mediators and entrepreneurial leaders. Drawing on these concepts, reform of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) is shown to be significantly shaped by proposals and outcomes in the international negotiations on agriculture during the GATT Uruguay Round, with the European Commission (EC) playing an entrepreneurial leader role
Commission · Political science · EU Law and Policy Analysis · Global trade and economics · Law
Free-riding on rent seeking—an empirical analysis
Regulating agriculture in the WTO
Assessing the Eu's Role in International Trade Negotiations
The European Union in international environmental negotiations
The 2003 CAP Reform
Centre–periphery conflict and institutional development
The Common Agricultural Policy Health Check
Australia and the European Union
The Logic of Policy Development
The 2003 Reform of the Common Agricultural Policy
International institutions and domestic policy
External shocks, policy spillovers, and veto players
Enlargement of the European Union and Agricultural Policy Reform
Des bureaucraties poreuses ? Les interactions de la commission européenne et du secrétariat du conseil avec leur environnement, et leur influence sur leurs préférences en termes de gouvernance
The reform of the 2003 Common Agricultural Policy
Free-riding on rent seeking—an empirical analysis
Renegotiation of the Wto Agreement on Agriculture
Reforming the WTO Legal Order for Agricultural Trade
Agricultural policy discourses in the European post-Fordist transition
Efficiency or credibility? Testing the two logics of delegation to the European Commission
From ‘Talking Shop’ to ‘Working Parliament’? The European Parliament and Agricultural Change
Agrarian Politics in Eastern Europe in the Shadow of EU Accession
Shifting policy positions in the European Union
State power, transformative capacity and adapting to globalization
Managing Globalization? The EU in International Trade Negotiations
Exploring the Determinants of CAP Reform
Introduction
Sequencing in public policy
EU–global interactions
The institutional construction of a policy field
Free to trade? Commission autonomy in the Economic Partnership Agreement negotiations
| Citations per year | 1.29 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2002 - 2024 (23) |
| Highly cited | No |