The Sufi Saint of Jam: History, Religion, and Politics of a Sunni Shrine in Shi'i Iran
Dados Bibliográficos
AUTOR(ES) | |
---|---|
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) | Universiteit Leiden, Nanjing Normal University, Tilburg University, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands, Xi’an Jiaotong University, P. R. China, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam |
ANO | 2021 |
TIPO | Book |
PERIÓDICO | Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology |
ISSN | 0022-0221 |
E-ISSN | 1552-5422 |
EDITORA | Annual Reviews (United States) |
DOI | 10.1177/00220221211025739 |
CITAÇÕES | 1 |
ADICIONADO EM | 2025-08-14 |
MD5 |
648D021DABB22A79ED7E78DB0D11A9E2
|
Resumo
In the global crisis of the COVID-19 pandemic, many countries attempt to enforce new social norms to prevent the further spread of the coronavirus. A key to the success of these measures is the individual adherence to norms that are collectively beneficial to contain the spread of the pandemic. However, individuals' self-interest bias (i.e., the prevalent tendency to license own but not others' self-serving acts or norm violations) can pose a challenge to the success of such measures. The current research examines COVID-19-related self-interest bias from a cross-cultural perspective. Two studies ( N = 1,558) sampled from the United States and China consistently revealed that participants from the United States evaluated their own self-serving acts (exploiting test kits in Study 1; social gathering and sneezing without covering the mouth in public in Study 2) as more acceptable than identical deeds of others, while such self-interest bias did not emerge among Chinese participants. Cultural underpinnings of independent versus interdependent self-construal may influence the extent to which individuals apply self-interest bias to justifications of their own self-serving behaviors during the pandemic.