Inter-nation influence revisited

Datos Bibliográficos

ID6284733
AutoresDavid A Baldwin (Dartmouth College, autor de correspondencia)
Año1971
Volumen15
Número4
Páginas471-486
Fecha de publicación1971-12-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaJournal of Conflict Resolution (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0022-0027 • E-ISSN: 1552-8766
EditorialSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/002200277101500405
OpenAlexW2124366313
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas10
Referencias citadas28

Since 1950 social scientists have made impressive progress in clarifying and operationalizing the concept of power. The disciplines of psychology, sociology, and economics, as well as political science, have contributed to this undertaking. Strangely enough, students of international politics, who have traditionally invested so much time and effort in power analysis, have largely ignored this process. Although students of international politics have continued to analyze power relations and to reformulate the concept of power, they have remained relatively isolated from the thinking of other social scientists on this issue. International theorists2 have neither contributed to nor drawn on the power literature generated by other social scientists. Although there are exceptions to this rule, it is fair to say that one rarely finds references by students of international politics to the standard works on power by Lasswell and Kaplan

Econometrics · Economics · Political economy · Political science · Positive economics · Sociology · European Union Policy and Governance · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Political Conflict and Governance · Psychology · Social Psychology