Lula's Brazil at Midterm
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6287463 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Wendy Hunter (0000-0001-5621-8402), Timothy J Power (0000-0003-3684-9914) |
| Year | 2005 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 127-139 |
| Publication date | 2005-07-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of democracy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1045-5736 • E-ISSN: 1086-3214 |
| Publisher | Project MUSE (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1353/jod.2005.0046 |
| OpenAlex | W2158538141 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 13 |
| References cited | 2 |
This article assesses the Lula government at midterm. The PT-led government has steered a surprisingly orthodox course in economics, social policy and party politics in light of the factors that led it to victory in 2002, namely, the PT's critique of the economic and social models promoted by the Cardoso administration, its reputation as untainted by corruption and clientelism, and Lula's close personal identification with the plight of the poor. While following convention has helped ensure political and economic stability, the PT's long-term contribution to democracy rests on its ability to promote meaningful social development and political reform
Clientelism · Convention · Democracy · Government (linguistics · Language change · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Reputation · Sociology · Victory · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Politics and Society in Latin America · Public Administration · Social Policy and Reform Studies
Rewarding Lula
Presidents, Parties, and Prime Ministers
Votes for Survival
When Movements Become Parties
Do the Poor Count?
Ideology and Networks
Up and Down with the Agrarian Question
Programa Fome Zero e o paradigma da segurança alimentar
Surviving Corruption in Brazil
Knowing Left from Right
Electoral Dividends from Programmatic Policies
O novo consenso da sociedade brasileira
Democracy on the Edge
| Citations per year | 0.68 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2007 - 2022 (16) |
| Highly cited | No |