When Should the Majority Rule
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6287570 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Steven Levitsky, Daniel Ziblatt (0000-0002-3401-6567) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 5-20 |
| Publication date | 2025-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of democracy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1045-5736 • E-ISSN: 1086-3214 |
| Publisher | Project MUSE (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1353/jod.2025.a947880 |
| OpenAlex | W4405585388 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
When do limits on majorities enhance democratic rule, and when do they undermine it? Constraints on majorities are, of course, essential to modern democracy. Liberal democracy is not simply a system of majority rule: It combines majority rule and protection of minority rights. But constraints on electoral majorities can also subvert democracy. This essay offers a new framework for understanding the ambiguous relationship between countermajoritarianism and contemporary democracy. Lumping all countermajoritarian institutions into the same category can lead us to preserve and prescribe outdated and undemocratic institutions that distort political competition and may undermine democratic legitimacy. This essay makes the case for a robust but minimalist countermajoritarianism. Although special protections for powerful minorities may have helped to secure the historical passage to democracy, today the healthiest democracies empower majorities
Political science · American Constitutional Law and Politics
What place for experts in liberal-democracies? Evidence from a Covid-19 citizens’ jury exercise
State of the world 2025
Polarization and Democracy in Central Europe
Are the upper chambers a source of democratic resilience? Evidence from elite perceptions in the Czech Republic
Constitutional renewals
Democratization and international conflict during and after the third wave
| Citations per year | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |