Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

How Latin America's Judges are Defending Democracy

Bibliographic Data

ID6287675
AuthorsDiego A Zambrano, Diego Zambrano (0000-0003-2590-6207), Ludmilla Martins Da Silva, Rolando Garcia Miron, Santiago P Rodríguez
Year2024
Volume35
Issue1
Pages118-133
Publication date2024-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of democracy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1045-5736 • E-ISSN: 1086-3214
PublisherProject MUSE (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1353/jod.2024.a915353
OpenAlexW4389736385
LanguageEN
Citations received6

Ten years of debates over democratic backsliding have failed to produce many examples of independent institutions thwarting authoritarian attempts on democracy. Yet Latin American courts seem to be countering this larger trend. The three largest countries in the region—Brazil, Mexico, and Colombia—have produced robust institutions able to check leaders with authoritarian tendencies, with high courts playing a fundamental role. In a dramatic succession of recent cases, courts in these three countries have been innovative, acted with a high degree of independence, and appear legitimately interested in defending democratic norms. All of this is profoundly surprising. There is little to no track record of independent Latin American judiciaries that stand in the way of authoritarian governments. Closer study of these three countries is therefore critical for scholars and practitioners, who are otherwise locked in debates over the importance of judicial review in preserving democracy. After dozens of judicial reform failures since the 1990s, we may be observing some overdue success. It appears that 1990s judicial reforms are making a comeback in Latin America

Authoritarianism · Democracy · Independence (probability theory · Judicial Independence · Latin Americans · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Supreme court · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Legal and Constitutional Studies · Legal processes and jurisprudence · Public Administration

  • Adjudicating for Democracy? How Ideas About Democratic Backsliding Shape Legal Interpretation

    Open Access•Henrique A Castro, Carla De Paiva Bezerra•International Journal of…•2026

  • Journalism Facing Autocratization

    Simone Benazzo, Florence Le Cam et al.•Journalism Practice•2025

  • Administrative democratic defence

    Open Access•Joep Van Lit•European Journal of Political…•2026

  • Defending democracy

    Open Access•Joep Van Lit, Maurits J Meijers•West European Politics•2025

  • Bolsonaro’s Botched Coup Attempt Exposed Political Fault Lines in the Brazilian Democracy

    Open Access•Lucas M Novaes, Diego Werneck Arguelhes•Revista de ciencia política•2024

  • Courts against backsliding

    Open Access•Laura Gamboa, Benjamín García‐holgado et al.•Law & Policy•2024

Unique citing works6
Citations per year3
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae