The Perils of Climate Alarmism
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6288148 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Thea Riofrancos (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 169-174 |
| Publication date | 2025-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of democracy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1045-5736 • E-ISSN: 1086-3214 |
| Publisher | Project MUSE (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1353/jod.2025.a947892 |
| OpenAlex | W4405585371 |
| Language | EN |
This essay examines the relationship between regime type and climate action, challenging the notion that authoritarian governments are better equipped to address the climate crisis. The author argues that democracies possess unique advantages in managing complex environmental challenges through dynamic information flows, vertical accountability, and multiplex political temporality. While acknowledging China's significant progress in renewable energy deployment, the analysis emphasizes that these achievements stem from specific institutional features rather than from authoritarianism itself. The essay concludes that effective climate action requires connecting planetary well-being to tangible improvements in daily life through democratic processes, grassroots organization, and positive policy feedback loops
Geography · Political science · Regional science · Climate Change and Geoengineering
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |