A Challenge For Democracy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6288873 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Christopher Walker (0000-0002-2096-489X), Christopher J Walker (0000-0002-1819-7388), Christopher K Walker (0000-0003-1427-5868), Melissa Aten |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 20-24 |
| Publication date | 2018-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of democracy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1045-5736 • E-ISSN: 1086-3214 |
| Publisher | Project MUSE (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1353/jod.2018.0001 |
| OpenAlex | W2783200563 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
With investigative reports focusing greater attention on the lavish lifestyles and illicit finances of certain states' officials and oligarchs, the term "kleptocracy" has become a regular feature of analysis. As the following essays show, this term signifies a problem that reaches from Russia to Malaysia to Equatorial Guinea, and one that poses increasing risk to democracy. Laundering both ill-gotten gains through the global financial system and their reputations through the services of "enablers" in the West, kleptocrats have found ways to successfully game the global system. In today's era of accelerated globalization, the factors driving kleptocracy have gathered force. The world now confronts "kleptocracy 2.0," a multifaceted threat to democracy that requires a coordinated and sophisticated transnational response
Democracy · Development economics · Economics · Globalization · Political economy · Political science · Sociology · Term (time · Corruption and Economic Development · Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance · Islamic Finance and Banking Studies · Law
Organization and organizationality of corruption
Transnational kleptocracy and the international political economy of authoritarianism
Explaining suspicious wealth
Cry the beloved administrative state
The Incumbency Advantage and the Enabler Effect
Covid-19 and Attitudes Toward Democracy
Corruption as Resource Transfer
Transnational uncivil society networks
| Unique citing works | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,14 |
| Citation span | 2019 - 2026 (8) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 8 |