Honesty pledges for the behaviorally-based regulation of dishonesty
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6289563 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Eyal Peer (0000-0002-9891-5297, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, corresponding author), Yuval Feldman (0000-0001-8416-865X, Bar-Ilan University) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 761-781 |
| Publication date | 2021-05-04 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of European Public Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1350-1763 • E-ISSN: 1466-4429 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13501763.2021.1912149 |
| OpenAlex | W3152566996 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 14 |
| References cited | 50 |
A common regulatory dilemma is determining how much trust authorities can place in people's self-reports, especially in contexts with an incentive to cheat. In such contexts, regulators are typically risk averse and do not readily confer trust, resulting in excessive requirements when applying for permits, licenses, etc. Studies in behavioral ethics have suggested that asking people to ex-ante pledge to behave ethically can reduce their level of dishonesty and noncompliance. However, pledges might also backfire by allowing more people to cheat with no real sanctions. Additionally, pledges' effects have almost always been studied in one-shot decision making without sanctions. We explore pledges' potential effects by manipulating whether pledges were accompanied by sanctions (fines) and testing their impact on sequential, repeated ethical decisions. We find that pledges can considerably and consistently reduce dishonesty, and this effect is not crowded out by the presence of fines. Furthermore, pledges also affect "brazen liars" who cheat to a large extent and also those who score low on tendency to follow rules and norms. We conclude that pledges could be an effective tool for the behavioral regulation of dishonesty, to reduce regulatory burden, and to build a more trusting relationship between government and the public
Affect (linguistics · Business · Cheating · Compliance (psychology · Dilemma · Dishonesty · Economics · Ex-ante · Government (linguistics · Honesty · Incentive · Microeconomics · Pledge · Political science · Public economics · Sanctions · Social dilemma · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Psychology · Regulation and Compliance Studies · Social Psychology
Are cash incentives always king? A randomized controlled trial evaluating hedonic versus cash incentives (TEH-C)
Performance management, gaming and regulatory monitoring
Inoculating Against Moral Disengagement Creates Ethical Adherence for Narcissism
Leveraging the Honor Code
Can We Commit Future Managers to Honesty
Enforcement styles unraveled
Individual accountability
Affidavit aversion
Competing Under Oath
How pledges reduce dishonesty
Making a promise increases the moral cost of lying
Behavioral Ethics
Varieties of regulatory regimes and their effect on citizens’ trust in firms
Effectiveness of ex ante honesty oaths in reducing dishonesty depends on content
Behavioral Equity
How Far to Nudge?
Responsive Regulation
White Lies
Honesty Requires Time (and Lack of Justifications)
Achieving Compliance when Legal Sanctions are Non‐deterrent
The Role of Trust in Nurturing Compliance
The Dishonesty of Honest People
Commitment and Behavior Change
Intrinsic honesty and the prevalence of rule violations across societies
Voluntary agreements to improve environmental quality
Lying Aversion and the Size of the Lie
Business culture and dishonesty in the banking industry
Retracted
Exploiting moral wiggle room
Economic Incentives and Social Preferences
The Law of Good People
Trust in Regulatory Regimes , by F. Six and K. Verhoest, Cheltenham, UK, Edward Elgar, 2017
Who’ll stop lying under oath? Empirical evidence from tax evasion games
Motivation crowding by economic incentives in conservation policy
Tax Morale, Rule-Governed Behaviour and Trust
Behavioral Ethics
Risk-based approaches to food safety regulation
Trust and compliance∗
Individual, cognitive and cultural differences in tax compliance
Beyond the Turk
Responsive regulation at the Dutch Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority
Trust and Trustworthiness
Really Responsive Risk-Based Regulation
Industry Self‐Regulation
The truth about lies
Motivating Environmental Action in a Pluralistic Regulatory Environment
| Unique citing works | 14 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,8 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 14 |