A Least Likely Case
Parliament and Citizens in the Netherlands
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6291973 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Rudy B Andeweg (0000-0003-4451-441X, Leiden University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2012 |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue | 3-4 |
| Pages | 368-383 |
| Publication date | 2012-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Legislative Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1357-2334 • E-ISSN: 1743-9337 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13572334.2012.706051 |
| OpenAlex | W2005666847 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 7 |
The Dutch parliament is a least likely case for studying relations between parliament and citizens: one House is not elected by the citizens, the number of MPs is low compared to the size of the population, and there is no territorial representation. Still, trust in parliament and in MPs is relatively high and shows no signs of decline. This paradox can be explained partially by Dutch citizens not expecting or not wanting their MPs to do constituency work, but also by the fact that Dutch MPs do take interactions with citizens seriously despite the lack of institutional incentives, as is evidenced by the number of hours spent on contacts with citizens, the large number of petitions about individual grievances or the introduction of the citizens' initiative
Economics · Incentive · Lower house · Market economy · Parliament · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Population · Representation (politics · Sociology · Work (physics · Demography · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Public Administration · Social Media and Politics
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2024 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |