The double-edged sword

The Political Appropriation of the Concept of Populism

Bibliographic Data

ID6292844
AuthorsAinur Elmgren (0000-0002-7460-0928, University of Helsinki, corresponding author)
Year2018
Volume23
Issue3
Pages320-341
Publication date2018-09-02
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Political Ideologies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1356-9317 • E-ISSN: 1469-9613
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13569317.2018.1502940
OpenAlexW2890457713
LanguageEN
Citations received8

The concept of populism has been in use in political debate for over a century. Because ‘populist’ is often used in a pejorative sense today, those to whom it is applied to tend to reject it. However, a closer look at the history of the concept reveals that while its meaning may fluctuate and even be dismissed as irrelevant, its use can become a political tool. This study of the use of ‘populism’ refrains from making value judgments on the actual populist nature of certain parties or political tendencies. Instead, it analyzes uses of the concept from a historical perspective. Special emphasis is placed on politicians who chose to define themselves as populist, or accept the label imposed by others, with particular focus on the Finns Party of Finland. Such self-identified populists draw their conceptions of populism from the ever-growing field of populism research, striving to appropriate and realize what scholars have only hypothetically described as a professed ideal. A closer look at the uses of populism as a political self-identity forces us to rethink its uses as a pejorative, or as an analytical, concept

Aesthetics · Appropriation · Epistemology · Identity (music · Ideology · Meaning (existential · Pejorative · Political science · Politics · Populism · Sociology · Law · Philosophy · Populism, Right-Wing Movements · Social Media and Politics

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access