Antagonism, hegemony and ideology after heterogeneity

Bibliographic Data

ID6293175
AuthorsLasse Thomassen (0000-0002-4706-6627, University of Limerick, corresponding author)
Year2005
Volume10
Issue3
Pages289-309
Publication date2005-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Political Ideologies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1356-9317 • E-ISSN: 1469-9613
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13569310500244313
OpenAlexW2023434829
LanguageEN
Citations received48

This article examines the implications of the introduction of the category of 'heterogeneity' in Ernesto Laclau's most recent work. Laclau's theory of hegemony and discourse theoretical approach to ideology is often associated with the category of 'antagonism'. I argue that heterogeneity should be the central category of hegemony and discourse analysis, and that antagonism can be seen as a strategy of ideological closure. In addition, heterogeneity—understood as the simultaneous condition of possibility and impossibility of hegemonic articulation—renders the theory of hegemony closer to Derridean deconstruction. Hegemony analysis and deconstruction are often presented as different and complementary theoretical moves. I argue that this is not the case, and that they can instead be seen as dealing with the same issues of the conditions of possibility and impossibility of the discursive constitution of ideology and identity

Articulation (sociology · Conflation · Deconstruction (building · Epistemology · Hegemony · Ideology · Impossibility · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Law · Philosophy · Political theory and Gramsci · Populism, Right-Wing Movements

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub