Public Capacity, Plural Forms of Collaboration, and the Performance of Public Initiatives
A Configurational Approach
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6295647 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sérgio G Lazzarini (0000-0001-8191-1241, Insper, corresponding author), Leandro S Pongeluppe (0000-0001-6195-4455, University of Toronto), Nobuiuki Costa Ito (0000-0001-5001-7204, Instituto Brasileiro de Mercado de Capitais), Felippe De Medeiros Oliveira (0000-0002-2428-3151, University of London), Armen Ovanessoff (Accenture) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 579-595 |
| Publication date | 2020-09-23 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1053-1858 • E-ISSN: 1477-9803 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/jopart/muaa007 |
| OpenAlex | W3009073673 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 20 |
| References cited | 66 |
We assess conditions that explain plural forms of public and private action using a comparative study of 24 public initiatives in Brazil, India, and South Africa. Measuring performance as evidence of positive outcomes to their target populations, we compare cases of high and low performance. Our configurational approach examines combinations of conditions leading to positive outcomes: public operational capacity, diverse collaborations nurtured by public units (with for-profit firms, with nonprofit organizations, and with other units in the public bureaucracy), and stakeholder orientation (permeability to multiple sources of input to design and adjust the project). We apply fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis to unveil configurations consistent with high performance. Our configurational analysis reveals two distinct paths to high performance. A path with higher private engagement involves concurrent collaborations with for-profit and nonprofit actors, whereas an alternative path with higher internal (public) engagement relies on collaborations within the public bureaucracy complemented by high permeability to inputs from multiple stakeholders. Our results also confirm that strong public capacity is necessary in all high-performance configurations. An important implication is that externalization and multiple forms of collaboration are not substitutes for weak governments. Furthermore, our configurational perspective contributes to the literature by operationalizing a multiple-actor, multiple-logic perspective describing alternative paths to high performance
Bureaucracy · Business · Decentralization · Economics · Externalization · Industrial organization · Operationalization · Plural · Political science · Public economics · Public relations · Public sector · Qualitative comparative analysis · Stakeholder · Computer Science · Corruption and Economic Development · Public Policy and Administration Research · Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research · Public Administration
Organizational governance and bridging activity places
Three Configurations of In‐House Government Consulting
O surto da Covid-19 e as respostas da administração municipal
The Covid-19 outbreak and the municipal administration responses
Governmental support strategies and their effects on private capital engagement in public–private partnerships
Contractual acrobatics
Too complex to collaborate? Rethinking CSO–municipal relations for public service provision
Sucesso em contratos baseados em resultado
Success in outcome-based contracts
Preventing disaster-related deaths
Evitando óbitos em desastres
The megaproject paradox in urban street food areas
Examining sustained sub-national health system development
South Korean social enterprises and their networks
Public value creation and appropriation mechanisms in public–private partnerships
Advancing Robust Governance in Turbulent Times
The benefits of nonprofit reputation
Commercial investment in public–private partnerships
The Dynamics of Sources of Knowledge on the Nature of Innovation in the Public Sector
Government-Created Nonprofit Organizations and Public Service Turnaround
Building State Capability
Politician’s Dilemma
Towards a multi-actor theory of public value co-creation
Substitutes or Complements? A Configurational Examination of Corporate Governance Mechanisms
A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations
CEO compensation in relation to worker compensation across countries
Proactive environmental strategies
Contracting for Government Services
Making Sense of Public Value
The New Public Governance? 1
Aid allocation and poverty reduction
The reliability of a two-item scale
Chapter 3 The Two QCAs
Above Politics
Good Government in the Tropics
The Purpose (and Perils) of Government-Nonprofit Partnership
The Sage Handbook of Case-Based Methods
Configurational Comparative Methods
Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences
Red Tape
Boolean Minimization in Social Science Research
Public Value Management
The Role of Democratic Values in Transformational Leadership
Public—Nonprofit Partnership
Managing Horizontal Government
Crisp-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (csQCA), Contradictions and Consistency Benchmarks for Model Specification
Set Relations in Social Research
Citizen‐Centered Collaborative Public Management
"Reinventing" Government
Do Networks Really Work? A Framework for Evaluating Public‐Sector Organizational Networks
Building Collaboration
Does Cross-Sectoral Partnership Deliver? An Empirical Exploration of Public Service Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Equity
Collaboration and Professionalization
The Necessity of Discretion
Combining Structure, Governance, and Context
Transaction Costs and Institutional Explanations for Government Service Production Decisions
Exploring the Determinants of Network Effectiveness
Organizational Capability in the Public Sector
Studying Governance and Public Management
External Actors, State‐Building, and Service Provision in Areas of Limited Statehood
Back to Square One
The Proper Scope of Government
Standards of Good Practice in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Fuzzy-Sets
| Unique citing works | 20 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3,33 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 18 |