Assessing drivers of sustained engagement in collaborative governance arrangements
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6295751 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Gwilym Ambrose (0000-0003-2784-2649, North Carolina State University), Saba Siddiki (0000-0002-5363-2672, Maxwell School, Syracuse University , Syracuse, NY 13244) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 498-514 |
| Publication date | 2024-10-04 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1053-1858 • E-ISSN: 1477-9803 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/jopart/muae005 |
| OpenAlex | W4391913762 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 10 |
| References cited | 43 |
The formal engagement of diverse stakeholder groups in policy design and implementation has become a mainstay governance strategy. While much has been learned about collaborative governance arrangements in terms of their structure, processes, and participant dynamics, one particularly salient dynamic has been relatively underexplored: the factors contributing to sustained participation in collaborative venues. Public administration and policy have developed a variety of conceptual theories which draw attention to interpersonal interactions and the ability of stakeholders to garner political wins as important contributing factors to sustained participation. In this article, we test four theoretically rooted hypotheses to investigate stakeholder attendance in the collaborative governance case of an environmental justice council. We analyze council meeting minute data using computational text analysis tools and a Stochastic Actor-Oriented Model to assess: (1) conflict and concord, measured in terms of repeated (dis)agreement with others and (2) interest advancement, or the extent to which a stakeholder makes positive, neutral, and negative comments toward topics which become the council’s annual objectives in relation to an individual’s attendance. Our interpersonal interaction results show that increased positive relationships are associated with increased attendance, and increased negative relationships are associated with decreased attendance, but, for both cases, only when interactions are repeated and not one-off. Our interest advancement results show: (1) an increase in supported annual objectives is associated with decreases in attendance for an individual stakeholder, but (2) increased oppositional and neutral annual topics are associated with a greater likelihood of attendance. This article contributes to existing scholarship on collaborative governance by offering additional insights into individual factors associated with sustained engagement in the collaborative venue. Furthermore, the article offers a generalizable methodological approach for analyzing these dynamics drawing on computational text analysis of meeting minute data
Business · Collaborative governance · Corporate governance · Political science · Process management · Regional science · Sociology · E-Government and Public Services · Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development · Public Policy and Administration Research · Finance · Public Administration
A sustainable assessment framework for cross-regional ecological governance
The Social Architecture of Collaborations in Four Watersheds
Enabling and Constraining
Exploring power imbalance in reciprocal scientific information sharing within a hydraulic fracturing policy subsystem
Why are policy actors so distrustful of each other, and how? Cognitive, behavioral, and endogenous relational sources of perceived distrust in governance networks
Evaluating Conflict, Interest Advancement, and Representation in Collaborative Governance
Developing trust to achieve complementarity for collaborative governance
Governance and global collaboration in non‐democratic countries
Exploring contextual influences in collaboration
Evaluating conflict in collaborative environmental governance
Handbook on Theories of Governance
Swimming Upstream
Collaborative policymaking
The Advocacy Coalition Framework
Collaborative environmental governance
Deliberative democracy and environmental justice
Expert‐Based Information and Policy Subsystems
From the Michigan Coalition to transnational collaboration
How does collaborative governance evolve? Insights from a medium-n case comparison
Measuring Policy Conflict and Concord
Linking Diversity of Collaborative Policymaking Venues With Procedural Justice Perceptions
Representation in Collaborative Governance
How Policy Rules Shape the Structure and Performance of Collaborative Governance Arrangements
The Design and Implementation of Cross‐Sector Collaborations
Policy Conflict Framework
Putting the “Public” Back in Public Values Research
Inside Collaborative Networks
Conflict Avoidance and Political Participation
Mitigating conflict with collaboration
Short-Term Versus Long-Term Coalitions in the Policy Process
Building a Conceptual Approach to Collective Learning
Governing Institutional Complexity
Matching policy tools and their targets
An Analysis of Micro-scale Conflict in Collaborative Governance
Self‐Organizing Policy Networks
Collaborative Institutions in an Ecology of Games
A leadership framework for cross-sector collaboration
Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice
A Quarter Century of the Advocacy Coalition Framework
Goodness of fit for stochastic actor-oriented models
Does the Network Centrality of Government Actors Matter? Examining the Role of Government Organizations in Aquaculture Partnerships
Community-Based Participatory Research as a Tool for Policy Change
The Devil Shift
Who Wants To Deliberate-And Why
| Unique citing works | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 10 |