Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Assessing drivers of sustained engagement in collaborative governance arrangements

Bibliographic Data

ID6295751
AuthorsGwilym Ambrose (0000-0003-2784-2649, North Carolina State University), Saba Siddiki (0000-0002-5363-2672, Maxwell School, Syracuse University , Syracuse, NY 13244)
Year2024
Volume34
Issue4
Pages498-514
Publication date2024-10-04
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1053-1858 • E-ISSN: 1477-9803
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/jopart/muae005
OpenAlexW4391913762
LanguageEN
Citations received10
References cited43

The formal engagement of diverse stakeholder groups in policy design and implementation has become a mainstay governance strategy. While much has been learned about collaborative governance arrangements in terms of their structure, processes, and participant dynamics, one particularly salient dynamic has been relatively underexplored: the factors contributing to sustained participation in collaborative venues. Public administration and policy have developed a variety of conceptual theories which draw attention to interpersonal interactions and the ability of stakeholders to garner political wins as important contributing factors to sustained participation. In this article, we test four theoretically rooted hypotheses to investigate stakeholder attendance in the collaborative governance case of an environmental justice council. We analyze council meeting minute data using computational text analysis tools and a Stochastic Actor-Oriented Model to assess: (1) conflict and concord, measured in terms of repeated (dis)agreement with others and (2) interest advancement, or the extent to which a stakeholder makes positive, neutral, and negative comments toward topics which become the council’s annual objectives in relation to an individual’s attendance. Our interpersonal interaction results show that increased positive relationships are associated with increased attendance, and increased negative relationships are associated with decreased attendance, but, for both cases, only when interactions are repeated and not one-off. Our interest advancement results show: (1) an increase in supported annual objectives is associated with decreases in attendance for an individual stakeholder, but (2) increased oppositional and neutral annual topics are associated with a greater likelihood of attendance. This article contributes to existing scholarship on collaborative governance by offering additional insights into individual factors associated with sustained engagement in the collaborative venue. Furthermore, the article offers a generalizable methodological approach for analyzing these dynamics drawing on computational text analysis of meeting minute data

Business · Collaborative governance · Corporate governance · Political science · Process management · Regional science · Sociology · E-Government and Public Services · Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development · Public Policy and Administration Research · Finance · Public Administration

  • A sustainable assessment framework for cross-regional ecological governance

    Open Access•Guangdong Wu, Yingjian Ren et al.•Socio-Economic Planning Sciences•2026

  • The Social Architecture of Collaborations in Four Watersheds

    Open Access•Mark T Imperial, Gwilym Ambrose•Administration & Society•2026

  • Enabling and Constraining

    Open Access•Lei Zhou, Jiannan Wu•Public Administration and…•2026

  • Exploring power imbalance in reciprocal scientific information sharing within a hydraulic fracturing policy subsystem

    Open Access•Jeongyoon Lee, Kun Huang et al.•Review of Policy Research•2025

  • Why are policy actors so distrustful of each other, and how? Cognitive, behavioral, and endogenous relational sources of perceived distrust in governance networks

    Open Access•Jeongyoon Lee, Jennifer Dodge•Journal of Public Administration…•2025

  • Evaluating Conflict, Interest Advancement, and Representation in Collaborative Governance

    Open Access•Gwilym Ambrose, Siwei Li et al.•Public Administration•2025

  • Developing trust to achieve complementarity for collaborative governance

    Open Access•Maria Jose Canel, Xabier Barandiarán et al.•International Review of…•2026

  • Governance and global collaboration in non‐democratic countries

    Open Access•Hamid E Ali•Public Administration Review•2024

  • Exploring contextual influences in collaboration

    Open Access•Zhihang Yuan, Xiaohu Wang et al.•Policy Studies Journal•2025

  • Evaluating conflict in collaborative environmental governance

    Open Access•Gwilym Ambrose, Jangmin Kim et al.•Review of Policy Research•2025

  • Handbook on Theories of Governance

    Christopher Ansell, Jacob Torfing•Handbook on Theories of Governance•2022

  • Swimming Upstream

    Paul A Sabatier, Will Focht et al.•Swimming Upstream•2005

  • Collaborative policymaking

    Open Access•Judith E Innes, David E Booher•Deliberative Policy Analysis•2003

  • The Advocacy Coalition Framework

    Paul A Sabatier, Paul Sabatier et al.•Theories Of The Policy Process,…•2019

  • Collaborative environmental governance

    Open Access•Örjan Bodin•Science•2017

  • Deliberative democracy and environmental justice

    Open Access•Amy Ro, James Van Alstine et al.•Local Environment•2021

  • Expert‐Based Information and Policy Subsystems

    Open Access•Christopher M Weible•Policy Studies Journal•2008

  • From the Michigan Coalition to transnational collaboration

    Bernadette Grafton, Alejandro Pérez et al.•Politics Groups and Identities•2015

  • How does collaborative governance evolve? Insights from a medium-n case comparison

    Open Access•Nicola Ulibarri, Kirk Emerson et al.•Policy and Society•2020

  • Measuring Policy Conflict and Concord

    Hongtao Yi, Christopher M Weible et al.•Society & Natural Resources•2022

  • Linking Diversity of Collaborative Policymaking Venues With Procedural Justice Perceptions

    Open Access•Jangmin Kim, Saba Siddiki•The American Review of Public…•2016

  • Representation in Collaborative Governance

    Open Access•Chris Koski, Saba Siddiki et al.•The American Review of Public…•2016

  • How Policy Rules Shape the Structure and Performance of Collaborative Governance Arrangements

    Open Access•Saba Siddiki, Saba N Siddiki et al.•Public Administration Review•2015

  • The Design and Implementation of Cross‐Sector Collaborations

    Open Access•John M Bryson, Barbara C Crosby et al.•Public Administration Review•2006

  • Policy Conflict Framework

    Open Access•Christopher M Weible, Tanya Heikkila•Policy Sciences•2017

  • Putting the “Public” Back in Public Values Research

    Open Access•Tina Nabatchi•Public Administration Review•2012

  • Inside Collaborative Networks

    Open Access•Robert Agranoff•Public Administration Review•2006

  • Conflict Avoidance and Political Participation

    Open Access•Stacy G Ulbig, Ulbig et al.•Political Behavior•1999

  • Mitigating conflict with collaboration

    Open Access•Elizabeth A Koebele, Deserai A Crow•Policy Studies Journal•2023

  • Short-Term Versus Long-Term Coalitions in the Policy Process

    Open Access•Matthew Zafonte, Paul Sabatier•Policy Studies Journal•2004

  • Building a Conceptual Approach to Collective Learning

    Open Access•Tanya Heikkila, Andrea K Gerlak•Policy Studies Journal•2013

  • Governing Institutional Complexity

    Open Access•Mark Lubell•Policy Studies Journal•2013

  • Matching policy tools and their targets

    Michael Howlett•Policy & Politics•2018

  • An Analysis of Micro-scale Conflict in Collaborative Governance

    Open Access•Nicola Ulibarri•Journal of Public Administration…•2024

  • Self‐Organizing Policy Networks

    Open Access•Ramiro Berardo, John T Scholz•American Journal of Political…•2010

  • Collaborative Institutions in an Ecology of Games

    Open Access•Mark Lubell, Adam Douglas Henry et al.•American Journal of Political…•2010

  • A leadership framework for cross-sector collaboration

    Barbara C Crosby, John M Bryson•Public Management Review•2005

  • Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice

    Christopher Ansell, Chris Ansell et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2007

  • A Quarter Century of the Advocacy Coalition Framework

    Open Access•Christopher M Weible, Paul A Sabatier et al.•Policy Studies Journal•2011

  • Goodness of fit for stochastic actor-oriented models

    Open Access•Josh Lospinoso, Tom Ab Snijders•Methodological Innovations•2019

  • Does the Network Centrality of Government Actors Matter? Examining the Role of Government Organizations in Aquaculture Partnerships

    Open Access•William Resh, William G Resh et al.•Review of Policy Research•2014

  • Community-Based Participatory Research as a Tool for Policy Change

    Open Access•Dana Petersen, Meredith Minkler et al.•Review of Policy Research•2006

  • The Devil Shift

    Paul Sabatier, Susan Hunter et al.•The Western Political Quarterly•1987

  • Who Wants To Deliberate-And Why

    Open Access•Michael A Neblo, Kevin M Esterling et al.•American Political Science Review•2010

Unique citing works10
Citations per year5
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 10

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae